TPO-35 - Integrated Writing Task
The article and the lecture both discuss both about an antique illuminated book which is written on vellum. The author of the reading states three theory about the origin of the book. The lecturer casts doubt on all three claims made in the reading and he strongly reject them.
To begin with, the author of the reading pushes forth the idea that this book is written by Anthony Ascham, a prominent physician and botanist, who wrote scientific and magical in this book. Moreover, it is mentioned that the plants illustrated in this book are similar to his previous works. In the lecture the professor has a completely different opinion toward this point. He says that Anthony Ascham was an ordinary scientist and his works especial the plants pictured in his books are popular plants which are available in different resources. He states that Anthony Ascham conveyed superficial information in his books not magical materials.
Furthermore, it can be inferred from the reading that Kelly, a novelist, who made fake and artificial books to make money may have created this book. It is noted that Kelly used alphabet to make his works weird to make people foolish and sell his books. While, the lecturer believes that people in sixteenth century were not smart as people are now therefore Kelly had not to make lots of strange and unfamiliar illustration to sell his books.
Finally, according to the reading passage Voynich , who is antique book seller, may have created the book to make tremendous amount of money by selling it. This point is entirely challenged by the lecturer, he asserts that by means of new technology and new scanning tools we have determined that both the vellum and ink used in this book were created about 400 years ago. Additionally, he states that it is impossible to make ink looks like a 400 years old although he can use a vellum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-30 | omega93 | 90 | view |
| 2020-11-06 | neda77aa | 90 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | persepolistmm | 43 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | amirakhlaghiqqq | 52 | view |
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- TPO 35 Integrated Writing Task 38
- If you want to choose to travel to one of two places that you have in mind, which of the following two ways do you prefer?-Finding information online about the two places-Asking friends who have been to the two places 73
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ee theory about the origin of the book. The lecturer casts doubt on all three claim...
^^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'rejects'.
Suggestion: rejects
...ims made in the reading and he strongly reject them. To begin with, the author of the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...according to the reading passage Voynich , who is antique book seller, may have cr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84639498433 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49874187092 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498432601881 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.128754104 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.