There are myriad factors or considerations which take into that in twenty years from now there will be lesser cars use than there are using today. As far as I concerned according to the following reasons and from my personal experiences, I am of the conviction that there will be more cars used in about twenty years from now. Someone can concisely wight the pros and cons of each. The reason will be explored in the following essay.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherences to my viewpoint with experiences is that in today's world cars has become more accessible than they are before due to the constant upgrading in technology car is become chipper than when they come first time now a middle-class family can afford a car easily so in near future more technology discover and will be more accessible, my experience is the best example for this back in the days when I don't have car I used to go with public transports for job but eventually this cost more so I buy car in lone so now I have car and comfort came with it.
Apart from the fact mentioned above, one should consider another sublet point meticulously pertaining to obtaining regard with huge experience. The noteworthy refreshing statistic revealed by a recently conducted social research in my country show that the majority of people agree with the fact that buy a car because of its show as social status symbol to shade more light in this issue according to the research done by Delhi University is that nowadays cars also run by CNG gas and working in solar power car which is a positive that car is not dependent in fule anymore, this will reduce the global warming.
Admittedly, someone can justification another side, the cars are the reason for the noise pollution and with an increase of car people need to find an alternative option for that so and there will be less car in future, But I still affirm that in twenty years there will be more car than there is today.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
- Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill. 60
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 73
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 66
- Do you agree or disagree: the high school students are required to study many different subjects at the same time or they should only study three or four subjects at a time? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 447, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...xample for this back in the days when I dont have car I used to go with public trans...
^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...ountry show that the majority of people agree with the fact that buy a car because of its show as social...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... for that so and there will be less car in future, But I still affirm that in twenty year...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60458452722 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53377445168 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512893982808 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.1344086022 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 185.855959011 48.9658058833 380% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.875 100.406767564 200% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.625 20.6045352989 212% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271059386451 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139204937363 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862970965319 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184255077607 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721875008671 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.1 11.7677419355 188% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.1575268817 186% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.29 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.0537634409 191% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.