There are myriad factors or consideration which take in to that how new technology make impact of children creativity in compare to the past. As far as I concerned according to the following reason and from my personal experiences, I am of the conviction that Technology made children less creative in compere to the past. Someone can concisely wight pros and cons of each. The reason will be explored in the following essay.
The First exquisite reason which gives adherence to my viewpoint with experience. Now day's children become less creative because they do not have to things that other children have did in past now technology is there for them to do that thing children are now less go out side to play because they love to watch TV in the house and sports is one of the best way be creative, my experiences is best example for this my nephew have it's project to do and he did not did it he just to internet and copy is project from internet in compare to this old days where we have to library and find project in book have to a way how to make take project.
Apart, from the fact mention above, one should mention another subtle point meticulously pertaining to optain with hug experience the noteworthy refeshing statistics revealed by a recent social research conducted in my country show that the majority of people agree with the fact take technology make children less creative and lazy as there is very little to do for children in compare to the past children. To shed the light in this issue according to the study in Delhi university the reason children is less and less creative because of technology for example children can find any thing with only finger tips way in internet which made them less and less conected with there book in which they have to find it out by them self and the fact that children is dependent in computer for calucaliton which make them lazy.
Admittedly, someone can justification on that technology opens new creative way for student which all knowledge they needed and can create some thing new which all this information, they can use children not need any they can do all by them self with internet and E-book which is more flexible then ordinary book but I still affirm that technology making student less creative.
In summary for all aformention reason one can infer that the impact of technology make children less creative in they were in past.
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 73
- People do many different things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 73
- Do you agree or disagree: the high school students are required to study many different subjects at the same time or they should only study three or four subjects at a time? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...have to things that other children have did in past now technology is there for the...
^^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
... do that thing children are now less go out side to play because they love to watch TV i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...he best way be creative, my experiences is best example for this my nephew have its pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...w have its project to do and he did not did it he just to internet and copy is proj...
^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...echnology for example children can find any thing with only finger tips way in internet w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...ll knowledge they needed and can create some thing new which all this information, they ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll by them self with internet and E-book which is more flexible then ordinary boo...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...rnet and E-book which is more flexible then ordinary book but I still affirm that t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udent less creative. In summary for all aformention reason one can infer that th...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ake children less creative in they were in past.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, then, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66588235294 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51258424431 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423529411765 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.1344086022 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 173.42825606 48.9658058833 354% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.3 100.406767564 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.5 20.6045352989 206% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274505893594 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13037685847 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671690997342 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18638042998 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470042113915 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 11.7677419355 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.1575268817 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.0537634409 187% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.