Some people may state the facts are more important as they reflect the reality. However, I think that understanding ideas and concepts is more significant for students, not matter studying science like math or studying literature.
To begin with, understanding the concepts is of vital importance for math students. In fact, the crucial part of math is to abstract the concepts from the facts. For example, we can find that a smart, little boy still could master the math while he has few practices. The possible reason is that this intelligent boy could understand the concepts and the connection between them easily. While the facts like how these ideas and concepts reflect the reality has little help to him. Thus, standing on the previous concepts and ideas, he can generate his own, brand-new ideas then. In this case, the facts are just the bridge for math students to get to the final aimed place. What they need to achieve is the concepts.
Meanwhile, except math or other scientific subjects, literature also require students to learn enough ideas and concepts, and just then they can be called "professional". Take studying how to write as an example. Many people have the ability to appreciate wonderful articles. On the other hand, even if they read a lot, most of them may still couldn't write such beautiful articles like a writer. It is not so hard to imagine the reason why they cannot write is that they lack specific knowledge about how to write. Maybe the facts always enough, but the writing concepts haven't been mastered by the usual people. As this example aptly illustrates, students whose major is literature have to learn adequate ideas and concepts in those areas, though the facts are easy to get. Understanding ideas and concepts is their major work.
In conclusion, understanding ideas and concepts is more important for students than learning facts. Mastering of facts is hard to determine the academic level of both math students and literature students, while mastering of ideas and concepts could.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 90
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 80
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 80
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...they read a lot, most of them may still couldnt write such beautiful articles like a wr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...always enough, but the writing concepts havent been mastered by the usual people. As t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05309734513 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76191588539 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52802359882 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4164402369 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.65 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.95 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275105043488 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934082882143 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932324150797 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191581545914 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477462265286 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.