The diversity of people's academic knowledge is one of the most important issue that may help in future success. Some people believe that it is better to have specialist in subject while the others think that it is better to have people with broad knowledge. From my perspective, I deeply believe that people should have specific knowledge and in what follows I will attempt to adress the most discernible reasons.
First and most, more specialist leads to more success. People should try to solve their own field of study rather than others. This is what a country need to get awesome progress. For instance, nowadays different journals are established to published specific knowleddge in different branch of knowledge. A human with broad source of knowledge cannot publish any paper in such a journals, because the subjects are extremely specific. Acoording to the publisher of ther journals, most of the invention in last two decades devoted to paper in specific subjects. Therefore, as the example shows, specefic branch of knowledge leads to paper and paper make people's life easier through new invention.
Second, when broad knowledge would be the base, a lot of people always argue. Accordingly, since the connection of people are so much, they want to bring their sight to the table while the others think the idea is wrong. For example, the residents of a country usually have broad knowledge in ecconomy. They always talk about bad and good aspects of their monetary situation and named their governments as responsible for their monetary mistakes. For example, The chief of Iran central bank, was harshly degraded in social network due to misconception of new law. Hence, broad knowledge in different majors yields more conflict among people.
Finally, the connection of the major may seem difficult due to different specific subject, but it can be solved by inventing new knowledge. For example, mechanical engineering and electronics are two essential parts of engineering. Since they have close relation ships, industrial engineering have been made to connect two different major. Hence, the problem of specializing the knowledge can be solved by emerging new field of research.
All in all, as the above mentioned examples have illustrated, specific fields of subject is more effective. Not only it does helps comunity to get progress, but also it prevents from conlict of idea and the deficit of major connection can be solve.
- TPO 1, Integrated Writing 3
- TPO 49 63
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- TPO 30 – Integrated 86
- TPO 49 - Integrated writing 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a journal' or simply 'journals'?
Suggestion: a journal; journals
...wledge cannot publish any paper in such a journals, because the subjects are extremely spe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... paper make peoples life easier through new invention. Second, when broad knowledge would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'major' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'majors'.
Suggestion: majors
...have been made to connect two different major. Hence, the problem of specializing the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18136020151 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71487216471 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52644836272 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1882523262 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205178222232 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584554207797 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552249147112 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11845705781 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506322827034 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.