I think that it is better to specialize in many different subjects than one. One reason is that you would probably have a lot of knowledge if you know many more different subjects. Another reason is that you can have more jobs if you have a wide knowledge of all subjects.
I think you would have a lot more knowledge and more skills if you are interested in all academic subjects. You would be able to do science as well as math at the same time. Learning more than one subject can help with everyday life. Knowing every subject can also be helpful, because you can be able to have much better task than people who can only do one subject well.
The final reason, is that you can have more jobs. You can have multiple jobs, specializing in different subjects. But another thing is that if you fail at one job, you will have many more opportunities for another job. You will eventually be able to make a lot more money.
It is overall better to specialize in many different subjects than just one. You can both have more knowledge, and have multiple jobs. Having knowledge in different subjects can let you be successful and makes your life a lot easier.
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold, arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, the environment of the North Slo 3
- Some people prefer to of exercise alone while others would like group sports Which do you prefer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One should never judge a person by external appearances Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 83
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...hink that it is better to specialize in many different subjects than one. One reason is that y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... It is overall better to specialize in many different subjects than just one. You can both ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, another thing, i think, you know, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 52.1666666667 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 1977.66487455 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 212.0 407.700716846 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50943396226 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39109538301 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 212.727598566 44% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443396226415 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 618.680645161 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9440189551 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.2857142857 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28441410285 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14261432329 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692805823777 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226177823206 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562272406818 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.09 8.01818996416 76% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 86.8835125448 26% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.