Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all honest companies’ advertisements, I firmly concur with the idea that most advertisements magnify about quality of products. The following paragraphs will substantiate the most outstanding reasons.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that majority of people do not have sufficient awareness of real quality of products advertised. Hence, companies exploit this unconsciousness and impose their opinions on people’s mind. As a matter of fact, it seems indistinguishable for people to choose high quality products. To illustrate, one needs only to refer to the number of children and adults impressed by subjective statements in advertisements. To demonstrate, most of the scientists all over the world contend that the people based on the advertisements make decision about quality of products. So they established an experimental program worldwide to estimate the effectiveness of advertisements on people’s shop. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of people are cheated by biased statements in advertisements and prefer to buy products advertised even with low quality.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that due to tough competition between companies, each of them tries to broadcast some advertisement to attract more attention. The modern world offer abundant examples of companies in order to survive in the market they exaggerate about their products’ quality. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that the majority of companies do not care about the quality of their products, but pay attention to advertisements of their competitors.
In today’s tough life, being aware of real quality of products is vital to everyone to have efficient shops. Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that we should contemplate about whether companies are honesty about their products or not. Indeed, companies not only exploit people’s unawareness of product quality but also consider only their profits to stay in the competition.
- TPO 10 -1 90
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 76
- tpo 24-1 71
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo17-1 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent social research'.
Suggestion: recent social research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that the majority ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73432835821 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41171438643 2.67179642975 128% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585074626866 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4587338762 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.066666667 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 10.9000537634 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.