Every one has their preferred way to receive information either from a single source or from a diversity of sources, and all of them have their own strength and weaknesses. I strongly believe that a person must get information from many several new resources. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations will be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, information received from different resources are more powerful. If the information were collected from a single setting, it would have greater probability to be bias and unreliable. Whereas when news are obtained miscellaneously, their base tend to be wider and more open to several perspectives. Thus, the receiver's personality gets highly affected and he becomes more capable of analyzing the data. An audience accepting media from single resource is not mentally and culturally open to accept other opinions. This may lead to devastating effects on countries regardless of it's general economic status. A wide rage of information is the safest option.
Furthermore, information got from a diversity of settings are more correct. If every source expresses it's data from it's own point of view, receivers would understand the bigger picture. Thus, more understanding is equal to better decision takers. For example, a judge does not listen only to one side of the story in his case. It is a very complicated process by which different resources express their ideas and information, and a wise judgement is made based on facts. Not only that, but also there would be a jury committee as well in order to expand the range of resources and perspectives. Different news resources enables people to make a more appropriate judgement.
Finally, another reason is that different news resources are more honest and trustful. People would believe the facts that are collected randomly from all the available places. When watching politics news, every media has it's own way to present the same news. A person who lacks the general reasoning would be violently drafted by all the enormous information. So, the variability in news resources allows the individual to get the most trustful news, rather than from a single perspective.
As a conclusion, well- informed individuals gets their information from many different news resources. These data are more powerful, correct, honest and trustful. Thereby, they create better generations and more developed futures.
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 80
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 76
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 80
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree:When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'receivers'' or 'receiver's'?
Suggestion: receivers'; receiver's
...open to several perspectives. Thus, the receivers personality gets highly affected and he...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...individuals gets their information from many different news resources. These data are more pow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29846938776 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91763472858 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5569347219 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8846153846 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57692307692 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219844422472 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649895383637 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694773440908 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140378925517 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316134631071 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.