Nowadays, there are too many sources of information from different means such as TV, papers, Internet, or just on the street. But the question is “Are those news resources valuable for people? Or can people get good information from them? In my opinion, those news sites are really useful for making people aware of what is going on in their city or country. Also, News should be revised first and then they come out, therefore people can trust on the information provided on them.
First of all, it is common knowledge that by hearing or reading news, you can understand the world where you live in, besides if you watch the news, you will always have the updated information which can give you more things to speak about with other people. For instance, yesterday I was with my father in law trying to have a conversation with him, but nothing came up, so as I had read something in the newspaper about the decrease in fruit’s prices, I tried with it, and we were talking around an hour, which helped me to get his confidence. This is how news could help you out by giving you more things to talk about.
Second, News businesses in order to come out information, they should revise first that there are no grammar errors and bad spelling. For that reason, people can ultimately be unconcerned about the fake news. Furthermore, information posted in news has some constraints, so if a child reads it, it will not be a problem. For example, there is a newspaper in Ecuador so-called EL UNIVERSO, which has an educational section for kids, and there are a lot of interesting mini-articles about science on it. As a result, even children are benefited with good resources from newspapers.
To sum up, the more you read the News, the more educated and well-informed you become, because you will have a bunch of topics to speak about, and you will have a pre-revision of news which will make you confident of the information you receive.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 85
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 80
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 76
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: father-in-law
.... For instance, yesterday I was with my father in law trying to have a conversation with him,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71637426901 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65180821251 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.33477089 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 5.45110844103 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197447111301 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749888725435 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368736820832 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126112631248 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122905040808 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.