It goes without saying that nowadays information plays a prominent role in all societies. Information affects people’s lives in many different ways. People could reach information through various news outlets. Some people may hold the view that a person must get information from many different news resources to be well-informed. However, some others may take an opposite view and believe that it is better to get information from only one news resource. From my vantage point, the former belief is more effectives. In what follows, I will elaborate on my idea through three reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that there are numerous events that happen around the world and one news resource never could cover all of them. In all countries many news outlets which have been published news of widespread fields in sport, art, economic, politics, etc. also, there are many channels like BBC, CNN, FOX news that report global and local news. To illustrate the variety of news outlets mentioned the statistical studies were conducted in our country and demonstrate the number of news resources in 2017 has increased growing by 35%. Each of the resource could report different news from other ones. Therefore, following several news resources helps to be aware of different types of news from various regions.
Another equally significant reason is that many of the news resources have deep connection to powerful politicians and government. Therefore, never should trust in one resource. One the other hand, different resources may report news from different viewpoints. Following several resources is more useful for two reason. First, let you the opportunity to analyze a matter from different aspects and second, let you to be aware of some news that don’t report by other resources. to illustrate, I would like to mention the results of a study that conducted in University of Illinois that reveals that people who use diverse resources to follow world news have higher EI (Emotional intelligence) than others who follow one or none resource.
All the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that get information from variety number of resources is more helpful to be well-informed than following just one resource. I highly suggested that following several online news sites inside television, radio and newspapers.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating childeren is more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking web site. 70
- TPO 40: surface of the venus is not possible habitant for human 68
- Genetic modification TPO 21 83
- TPO45- the evidence of the existence of bees more than 200 million years ago. 3
- TPO40 independentSome parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ormation affects people's lives in many different ways. People could reach information th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...that a person must get information from many different news resources to be well-informed. How...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...t don't report by other resources. to illustrate, I would like to mention the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27659574468 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79603126871 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518617021277 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.5656052675 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4761904762 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9047619048 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263035549339 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900891577715 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685657128815 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178277160506 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025000292562 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.