Genetic modification TPO 21
The reading passage claims that the Genetic modification is now being used to improve trees through genetic modifications. It makes the chance to trees to produce more fruit, grow faster and increase the trees’ persistent against climate changes. However, the lecturer finds them all of them dubious and assert some evidence to refute all of them.
The author explains an example of Hawaii in which the new pest-resistant species of papaya trees have been developed which is persisted against ring spot virus that has various damages on native papaya trees. On the contrary, the lecturer asserts although the benefits of genetic modification are obvious, there are many other disadvantages. By applying this method express in the climate changes are the trees are been affected in a similar manner while some of the native trees can be persisted in that condition.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that genetic modification brings up more productivity and economic benefits to the farmer. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the fact that applying this method has hidden costs.
Finally, the passage argues that genetic modification makes the new opportunity of fast growth of trees in order to produce timber and many application in the wood industry.
While the lecturer brings up the idea that growing trees essentially is needed many resources while providing required resources is not reach easily.
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Do you agree or disagree?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organized. 76
- TPO40 independentSome parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one? 78
- TPO 40: surface of the venus is not possible habitant for human 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar manner" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...changes are the trees are been affected in a similar manner while some of the native trees can be p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...been affected in a similar manner while some of the native trees can be persisted in that c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun application seems to be countable; consider using: 'many applications'.
Suggestion: many applications
...of trees in order to produce timber and many application in the wood industry. While the lectur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... many application in the wood industry. While the lecturer brings up the idea that gr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34375 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74654453011 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2579917683 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.7 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383058347238 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145722465165 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888761889252 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195548361742 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089766140511 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.