The majority of people who are in their early to mid-twenties think that people have to collect information from just one news resources in order to be well-informed. They support that in the world, a great deal of news broadcast the same topic when the occurrence happened. However, the notion does not the stance that I hold and should be thought about in a different light. I believe that people have to collect information from different news resources in order to be well-informed. This is because they are not bias at one opinion and able to have opportunities to learn a lot of matters from different news resources.
First of all, collecting information from different news resources enable people to not be bias at one opinion from news they saw. Interestingly, it has been a topic on various social network websites such as Tweeter where people hold different opinions. Initially, I thought that collecting information from one news resources is better in order to be well-informed. However, after reading relevant tweet feeds, I realized that people would be bias at one opinion from news if they collect information from one news resources. For example, when I was a high school student, I could not get any information from the Internet, just from SBS which is Korea news channel. At that time, I did not realize that this channel is bias at one side of politic opinion. However, after the appearance of the Internet, I can access a lot of information from Youtube and collect a lot of different information from that. It makes me broaden perspectives with different thinking. Thus, it proves that it is better for people to get information from various news resources in order to not be bias at one opinion from just one news resources.
Moreover, the most important thing to do for people is to collect information from various news resources for learning a lot of things from them. To be specific, people are able to create their own philosophy during collecting information from many news resources, which as a result allows people to better understand, stay ahead, and better quality of life. As modern society is becoming increasingly, the today’s globalized world requires people to have their own philosophy. People can did this better by collecting information from many different news resources. For instance, Steve Jobs, who is the founder of Apple, mad great accomplishments in his lifetime. I read online that he was successful because he was global minded and had his own philosophy about his business. He did this by collecting a lot of information from different news resources and making his own opinion from them. Hence, it is more important for people to get a lot of information from various resources in order to learn many things from them.
To sum up, I believe that collecting a lot of information from different news resources is better for people to be well-informed. It makes people to be not bias at one opinion and be able to have opportunities to learn a lot of matters from different news recourses. Consequently, the importance of my view cannot be underestimated in that it can kill two birds with one stone for the reasons I have mentioned.
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- 41. A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, howe 83
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 80
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by the society in the past than today 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...formed. They support that in the world, many news broadcast the same topic when the ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...formed. They support that in the world, many news broadcast the same topic when the occur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...people have to collect information from many different news resources in order to be well-info...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rst of all, collecting information from many different news resources enable people to not be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s better by collecting information from many different news resources. For instance, Steve Job...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248322147651 0.229887763892 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.159395973154 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0906040268456 0.0866891130778 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0436241610738 0.046263068375 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0620805369128 0.0685040099705 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.151006711409 0.118717715034 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0352348993289 0.0351676179071 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94209025384 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0402684563758 0.0309702414327 130% => OK
Particles: 0.00167785234899 0.00188951952338 89% => OK
Determiners: 0.0570469798658 0.0887237588012 64% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.011744966443 0.0209618222197 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011744966443 0.0139019557991 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3193.0 2387.08602151 134% => OK
No of words: 540.0 408.028673835 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91296296296 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.337037037037 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25 0.251872472559 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183333333333 0.174417080927 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.157407407407 0.112833075102 140% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94209025384 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.353703703704 0.524397521467 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.1528390412 59.2087087015 70% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6814341255 48.84282405 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.72 120.699889404 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.644075263715 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 46.6 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.63924050633 1.45489161554 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344669173689 0.300154397459 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.160968920761 0.103427244359 156% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.111793330011 0.0752933317313 148% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.503210279987 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170889231366 0.151897553556 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153919024899 0.114077575197 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915370371415 0.0781384742642 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.524536106849 0.336927656856 156% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0466259673252 0.067059652881 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284243802134 0.210909579961 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427677701502 0.0618886996521 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.75985663082 290% => OK
Total topic words: 24.0 13.6433691756 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.