Throughout the history, human beings are searching the secret of being successful. We can learn from the experience that the majority of success people are those who are good at innovation and bold enough to try new things. From my knowledge, I believe that those bold people who are no afraid of taking risks and do innovation are more likely to get success. The reasons are listed below.
To begin with, the market loves new products. From the economics study, customers are easily getting tired of the old stuff. That means, when newly design products came to the market, customers would crazy for it. Even though the design and manufacture part may be risky, but the reward would be very profitable. After all, if your company is the only one make this new model, no one could compete with you.
However, there would be much more competition in the easy doing tasks which make people more difficult to get success. For example, companies may find more competitors in the old industry which mechanisms are well known to everyone. Same as employees in the company. Workers who only doing simple jobs - like catering - are easy to be replaced by other people. Besides the competition, they tend to get less salary.
Here are more examples to show how easy it is to be successful by doing new things. When the first online shopping center opened it's website in Asia during early 2000s, there was no other e-commercial carriers compete with. Several years later, the owner of that website became the most wealthy people in that region. He was financially successful at that time. But later, as more and more shopping website launched online, the former lost his leading position in the industry drastically. And an economy professor once addressed this case in his book. The professor wrote that the easiest way to get success is to create new out of none.
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 85
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w model, no one could compete with you. However, there would be much more compet...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pany. Workers who only doing simple jobs like catering are easy to be replaced ...
^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o only doing simple jobs like catering are easy to be replaced by other people....
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, after all, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83489096573 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38720365234 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591900311526 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6446685051 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9047619048 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188179391835 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505188341651 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561595821369 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110065713881 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270127117342 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 67.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.