In the modern era, taking risks is considered a key factor contributing to the success rates of individuals and incorporations. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the necessity and the amount of venture that people have to take in order to contrive. Many people adhere to the view that putting yourself in danger is not a convenient approach to thrive, while others consider daring as one of the bases of success. I strongly agree with the second opinion. I think this way for 2 reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, trying new methods would increase your experiences by pushing you beyond your capabilities and breaking the boundaries. Even if you fail during this process, extra knowledge is added to your brain database which might be handy in the future. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last summer, during my internship program as a research assistant in a laboratory, I was given plenty of options to work on. I chose the hardest one which required a great number of work hours and also there was a high chance of not finishing it on time. Although I put a lot of effort into this project, it didn’t complete on-time; As a result, I didn’t get a proper grade despite all of my endeavors. But the next semester, one of my professors sent me an email that asked me to be his teaching assistant because of my summer experience.
In addition, you will end up with a better result in comparison with ubiquitous approaches. Sometimes the problems don’t have one absolute answer. However, most people prefer the common procedures for solving them because they are more accessible and in some cases, more reliable. To put it in a more vivid picture, in the final days of the last semester of university, I was expected to deliver a project. The algorithm was straight-forward but our instructor added motivation for us for not using that routine by setting some extra marks. putting all my energy to find a different solution was a gamble because that was my only shot. Finally, not only I came up with a different response, but also my style was considered to be the best answer and I got the top mark.
In conclusion, I’m of the opinion that we have to dare trying new strategies. This is because we earn extra skills, and we can discover more efficient ways of problems.
- some people believe that video games could inspire young student's interests and make their study more efficient rather than distracting them and the waste of time so young student should be allowed to play video games 90
- Essay topics: TPO-43 - Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Putting
...at routine by setting some extra marks. putting all my energy to find a different solut...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73734939759 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80298660783 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5078425179 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.619047619 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128809743081 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393886993201 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326538937089 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747079107233 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375335357477 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.