Nowadays, more and more schools began to restrict their teachers from talking about their own political and social preference in the classroom. While some educators worried that this move offended their rights of free speak, supporters embraced schools' decision for they do not want students to be disturbed by politics. I agree with the supporters that teachers should stop speak their social or political views out to students. The explanations go as follows.
In the first place, students' political preference would be influenced by teachers'. From the phycology study, without the mutual independent thinking, young kids are easy to be deceived and are likely to follow the authority. In other words, students would think the teacher's political views are the authority, and take them as their own political views.
Moreover, talking politics in class would distract students from their courses. The length of classes is limited. In other words, if a teacher spends time talking about information unrelated to the curriculum, students will get less knowledge from the class. For example, during the Cultural Revolution in China, pedagogues spend too much time talking about the politics. As a result, people went to school at that time barely learned anything from the classroom.
In addition to the previous points, publicly speak their social or political views in the classroom would cause troubles to teachers themselves. We are not lack of the news that teachers got discarded from school or been prosecuted after they advocate their religion belief in the classroom. Considering about this, it would be safe for our instructors to keep their political views to be private.
In conclusion, taking politics with students in the class would waste their time as will as influence their political preferences. Besides the negative effects on students, teachers may also get hurt from doing so. In short, talking politics with students in the class would do no go to both students and teachers.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 81
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 70
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ep their political views to be private. In conclusion, taking politics with stu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in short, talking about, as a result, in other words, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31034482759 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65074410602 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526645768025 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9294748412 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260270287829 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930884249396 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766010507129 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164537885177 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606149295775 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.