Teachers considered the most influencers on students’ lives; thus, it is very crucial for teachers to be careful in their topic discussion with their students. From my point of view, I think teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom, so I firmly agree with the statement. There are many reasons for me to hold this opinion, two of them that are as follows:
To begin with, teachers' social or political perspectives can cause serious problems to student's personal lives. Students trust and learn from their teachers and they may believe the teachers' views and become adamant about the opinion that they learn from teachers. However, this is not a good thing if students' family have opposite social or political views. My friend's brother is a compelling example of this. His history teacher is a favorable side of the liberal political party and he expressed his opinion in front of his students in the classroom. On the other hand, my friend's family supports a conservative party, which was contrary to the teacher's views. Later on, my friend's brother started a conflict with his parent and siblings supporting the liberal party because he was influenced by his teacher's perspective. This caused a big problem in my friend's house, which is obviously triggered by the teacher. For this reason, I think teachers should avoid stating their political opinion in school.
Another reason teachers should not mention their political or social opinions is to not have a conflict between teachers and students in the classroom, which could negatively affect the students' academic lives. Thus, it is important to keep the class efficient for studying not for arguments. For instance, my friend, during our college study, had an argument with a professor about a religious topic. Eventually, this argument led to a serious conflict that became a personal issue to both. Since the professor had more power at college and specifically his course, my friend failed his course because of that argument. Therefore, I strongly believe teachers must not discuss social or political subjects in the class because it could lead to serious problem affect the students' future.
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 83
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 75
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 81
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 73
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinion, two of them that are as follows: To begin with, teachers social or politi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14127423823 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66522880284 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501385041551 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4192564873 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.176470588 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273954845935 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980365187076 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955858024314 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220191517619 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719658682069 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.