In the contemporary world the speed in performing tasks is as important as efficiency. Whether it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes is more important or to work slowly and make sure everything is correct is a controversial question. Some people are inclined to the idea that it is more important to work slowly and make sure everything is correct. Others are believe that it is more important to work quickly does not matter the mistakes. I firmly concur with the argument and assert that making mistakes is unavoidable part of a fast efficient work.
First thing to point out is that in order to be productive it is important to work quickly. Therefore workers should take risk of making mistakes in order to have their task done it time. An experiment was conducted on two group of employee show that, performing basic tasks , workers who are working very quick and took did not care about making mistakes, did accomplish their work in more efficient way than the other group who tends to make sure that everything is right and took their time. Therefore, speed is a crucial factor in an outstanding work.
Another factor to take in consideration is performing tasks in speed manner is not necessary means making mistakes. In this case workers who try to finish their work in a short amount of time are taking risk of making mistakes , but they also may not. It`s clear that a correct result is better than mistaken on, but the time also is count. Therefore it is best to try to accomplish the assigned work in the time frame than to take your time submit it lately.
In conclusion, it is obvious that achieve maximum productivity, it is more important for workers to have their work done in a short period of time than to work slowly and make sure everything is perfect.
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 65
- The article and the lecture are both discussing about the decline in frogs population. The reading claims that this phenomenon could be prevented, and explains three method for it. The professor dismisses all methods by saying that none of methods could p 81
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 78
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- do you prefer to have knowledge about a variety of subject or about one specific subject and why 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome people are inclined to the idea that it is more important to work slowly and ...
^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
... sure everything is correct. Others are believe that it is more important to work quick...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...uctive it is important to work quickly. Therefore workers should take risk of making mist...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...ime. An experiment was conducted on two group of employee show that, performing basic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ployee show that, performing basic tasks , workers who are working very quick and ...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... time are taking risk of making mistakes , but they also may not. It's clear ...
^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...istaken on, but the time also is count. Therefore it is best to try to accomplish the ass...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...kers to have their work done in a short period of time than to work slowly and make sure ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k done in a short period of time than to work slowly and make sure everything is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69496855346 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59732246446 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446540880503 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6596813277 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422703923326 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169210855173 0.076458572812 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109004316414 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283544221946 0.150856017488 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113360780489 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.