TPO 25
The lecture and the passage are both about the use of electricity on Ancient world, especially in recent archeological investigations in Iraq which revealed clay jays containing a copper cylinder; each one surrounded with an iron rod. The author of the article feels that these findings have no reasonable support for use of electricity in the ancient civilization. However, the professor challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that these vessels could be used as electric power in the old centuries.
To begin with, the author argues that no evidence of any conductors has been found in order to use the electricity. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. she claims that these vessels and cylanders are initially foud by local people, not archeologist. She skepticize that every elements may reamained without any change. She suggests that might have some conductors which archeologist didnot discovered.
Seconly, the writer suggests that there is no unique historical finding since alike cooper cylinders had been discovered in another ancient city named Seleucia. The author supports this idea that cooper cylinders were used to hold scrolls and sacred texts, not for electric power generating, in ancient Seleucia. On the other hand, the lecturer defends the idea of electricity-generating because the archeologists discovered iron rods surrounding the clay jays. She adds that it is possible to use exact cylender in two cities but rather for two deferens disposes.
Finally the author posits that these facilities should be used in order to a concrete practical way while there is no evidence of any devices which demands electricity. In contrast, the lecturer questions this idea by simple examples of possible uses of electric power. These examples include medical uses and defending uses of electricity. In ancient medicine, for instance, the physician used a mild shock, called The Magic, to heal or manage pain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...argument is challenged by the lecturer. she claims that these vessels and cylanders...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...t rather for two deferens disposes. Finally the author posits that these facilities...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95263814107 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0895303141 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8823529412 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335161551168 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985883955134 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707321788338 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197410351561 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677130682798 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.