In the modern era, as a result of significant changes in human being lifestyle's, education plays a crucial role in our lives. Due to its paramount importance, there is an argument among various people about whether universities should increase the salaries of the professors in order to improve the quality of education. From my own perspective, I firmly believe that they should not increase the salaries of the professors and I will explicate my points of view through the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the increment in their salaries would make them more reluctant to search for opportunities to improve the industries of their countries by solving industry’s issues and problems. A very tangible example to illustrate this argument could be the car industry in Iran. As everybody knows, the car factories confront lots of difficulties in the process of designing and producing an automobile. Assume that the salaries of the professors of mechanical department do not increase as it should. The professors would look to find other financial resources to increase their total salaries like try to solve those difficulties for car factories. This decision will lead to increase in their total salaries and improvement in car industries.
Likewise, equally relevant to the prior argument, it is important to consider this point that in many universities, the professor would try to fund some of their students to work on some special projects. Those projects are mainly the problems that exist in the factories and industries. Also, those problem could be solved by the effort of these students. So, the fund that a professor considers for one student would result in a solution for industries' problems and also an increase in professor salary. Ergo, an increment in their salaries would make them more reluctant to fund some student and to solve factories' problems.
Although the previous reasons are the first ones crosses our minds at first glance, they are by no means the only one available. Actually, there is another subtle point which must be beard in mind. The noteworthy refreshingly intelligible study, revealed by a recent social research, conducted in our country, support that the salary of a university professor is among the top five salaries in our country. It also compared the amount of time that he has to spend on his job and an engineer would spend and its result is amazing. According to the result of this study, the amount of time that an engineer would spend on his job would be three times more than a professor, But his income is half of the professor. Therefore, it is not fair to an engineer and other careers that the professor salary should be increased.
To make a long story short, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that it is unfair to other careers that there is an increment in professors' salary. Actually, there are some other reasons and examples, supporting the claim, which is not mentioned above due to the dearth of time. All in all, I suggest professors look for some problems in their countries that can be solved by their help and try to solve those.
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'those problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; those problems
... in the factories and industries. Also, those problem could be solved by the effort of these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, likewise, look, so, therefore, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2651.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 530.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00188679245 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83270894076 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447169811321 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 826.2 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5548444881 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.260869565 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0434782609 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52173913043 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101711233073 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347348762786 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422748936343 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637378149717 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443356463595 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.