There is no shortage of debate about the best option in labour hours management. Without a question, many would think that concentrate the hours worked in only three days could be the best and more enjoyable option while others may consider other point of view, depending in their own interests. As far as I am concerned, I would rather work five days a week for shorter hours. I feel this way, mainly for two reasons I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, a person who has to work during long hours during the day can not spent time with his or her family during those days. In other words, this option could only work for a single person that has no children under his or her care, but never for a family person. My own experience is a compelling example to illustrate this point. I am a single mother who likes to be at home when my children come back from school. It is important to be there for them to provide their dinner and help them with their homework. Therefore, if I would have to work long hours I would miss that time with them and they would be neglected.
Secondly, I believe that a worker that interrupts their work for five days could lost the track of his or her job missing some important issues to address. As a result, his or her job could be jeopardised with a long absence. To illustrate this idea let's consider the following example. For instance, a worker that has to follow up a delivery of a service has to be accessible in case the client requests assistance. As a result, if he fails to help the client, he or she could ends up with a complain from that client.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that working only three days could bring more troubles than joy for a worker, and that the better option is working five days in a row with short shifts. This is because the worker could spent quality time with his family and also because the job would not be jeopardised by long gaps of absences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...uring long hours during the day can not spent time with his or her family during thos...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...terrupts their work for five days could lost the track of his or her job missing som...
^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'end'
Suggestion: end
...ils to help the client, he or she could ends up with a complain from that client. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he client, he or she could ends up with a complain from that client. In conclusion, I s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...hifts. This is because the worker could spent quality time with his family and also b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40166204986 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35728375543 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476454293629 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7743738566 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4705882353 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265809702113 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878184041717 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755228713292 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179298822355 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391465074554 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.