The role of young people has always been a very significant matter when it comes to the future of societies. That is owing to the fact that so genius are the young people that they can always have creative ideas and new alternatives about the solution of the problem. There are those who contend that in today's modern era, there is no influence by the young people in order to create better future for their society. I personally repudiate this statement as it seems irrational. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reasons of my decision more.
To begin with, The most imperative reason comes to mind at first is that the characteristics that young people have in comparison to the old. At first glance, it is conspicuous that they have more energetic body and more creative mind which help them to have more power to influence their society. Last week when I read a magazine, I faced with a title which stated about the increase the powerful effect of young on society in comparison to 50 years ago. As I read, this social reaserch has been done about my country and perhaps more research needs to be done in order to confirm exact effect of them. I think this research is generally good to consider as a supporting of my idea but maybe it is solely weak to count on.
Another interesting point that deserves some point here is about the population of the young people. This is too high to can effect on the future of society. As we all know, in the epidemiology science, the researchers always study about the number of different parameters. Depend on, I believe that the more kind of people that exist in one country, the more their wants can be reached. In that case, I think due to the number of young people which is the most in my country, they can have great influence in society's future. Also, they all have positions in different part of institutes and so on that it help them to show their ability more.
To wrap it all up, taking all the aforementioned idea into consideration, I believe that young people depend on different condition can have effect on the future of the society. Not only have they more creative ideas but also they are much enough to have effect on the whole. So, it is highly recommended that assign more work to them in the society to get important decisions.
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 76
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 83
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 80
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 78
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, i think, kind of, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53477218225 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50087598016 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458033573141 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9948371685 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5263157895 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177772553433 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600056751085 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418015065821 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123728110293 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390690813955 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.