In the modern society, there’s no doubt that team working has became one of the most important skills for both children and adults. So I totally approve the point that working together can make students learn more effectively for the following reasons.
To begin with, what’s the most primary is that by working together, they can fully communicate with each other causing them have better acknowledge of the whole work. Through the communication, students enjoy the chance to express their own opinion and learn the advantages of others. For example, when I was in a summer school and required to make a present about culture. Not working alone, I chose to work in a team with four students who came from different countries. With a whole day’s communication, I got a better understand of other countries culture so that I can introduce it in more than just the view of my own country. Thus working together truly opens our horizon.
Moreover, working together is effective for reducing various of time. Let’s think about if you have to work alone, you have to waste lots of time on preparation and the decision of sequence of work. On the contrary, by working together, you just need to care about your own tasks that it is a really effective way to save time and money. According to a research by the Peking University in 2016, the efficiency of working together is 2 times more than working alone in most situations. What’s more, when working together, you can ask any question when you have no idea. This is impossible if you just work alone.
Admittedly, sometimes working alone is also necessary such as studying math problems and final projects which normally are required to be done alone. However, these conditions are in fact limited. In most conditions, we have the power to work with friends or classmates. For instance, some may think scientists always work alone, however, nowadays most scientists have to work together to deal with the super machines which cost millions of dollars, not alone workers who always need team work.
Due to aforementioned reasons, it’s easy to draw a conclusion that working together is more effectively than working alone for better communication and saving more time.
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 61
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 73
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 60
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...e's no doubt that team working has became one of the most important skills for bo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ay to save time and money. According to a research by the Peking University in 2016, the e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.024 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74652944641 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522666666667 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4447310526 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1578947368 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325792127396 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112344027017 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592670429558 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19288388796 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424336743337 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.