Projects are a good way to make sure that the students understand all the parts the teacher teach them, so most of the teachers asking to do it as a group of students to search about topics rather to their filed that they study. In my opinion, teachers should make some optional to do it, alone or in a group, not force them to have projects in group.
First, finding some students that match together to make a successful group is a hard job, most of the time the members of the groups have not the same idea to make a finally decision, because of that they always have an argument, and some of them leave a group, so the teachers should have asked them to do whatever is easier for them. For example, I always couldn’t do in group as well as I can. I remember in 2015 I worked for an office to decorated interior houses, and the manager decided to give me a group with professional people, at the end of the week I left them because they were very proud on themselves and I couldn’t have tolerated them and do that job alone and the result of that was fantastic.
Second, on the other hand, working as a good group makes works much easier than working alone, because they can separate the parts of job and every one can do their par very well, also it’s make the results unbelievable great. For example, the group of sun theater of Europe they are working very well together and if some of them quit the program canceled. They have an interesting theater with different subjects as comedy or dramatic, beside of the fantastic actors, they have a great decorator to make marvelous decors to attract lots of people, at the end you can see the successfully group projects have done, in addition they have lots of fan to follow them on social pages, that makes them famous.
In summarize, working as group or alone it depends on people and nobody should force them to do what.
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing 3
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 76
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 59
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('finally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decision') instead of another adjective.
...e groups have not the same idea to make a finally decision, because of that they always have an ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 644, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fan seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of fans'.
Suggestion: lots of fans
...ojects have done, in addition they have lots of fan to follow them on social pages, that ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4683908046 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39666025554 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471264367816 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.256757451 48.9658058833 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.777777778 100.406767564 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.6666666667 20.6045352989 188% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 5.45110844103 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163125118045 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880440722815 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397149650954 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122065082972 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290209242302 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.