Students in their school will get several projects and assignments that should be done in a limited time. By the evolvement in teaching methods, now teachers utilized manifold techniques to teach students several concepts such as time management, responsibility, collaboration, to name but a few. Although some people believe that it is not an effective way to assign projects to a group of students, I have a different point of view. As far as I am concerned, I have a penchant for this standpoint that students learn much more if they work in a group on a project rather than working alone. There are numerous reasons for holding that opinion, two of which are of paramount importance, which are elaborated hereunder.
To begin with, the most striking reason why I support this view is the fact that students will learn how to collaborate with each other. It stands to reason that when a task is done with several people, finishing it in time will be more possible. Therefore, students will learn that it will be easier for them if they divide the task among themselves. Moreover, they will understand that if one of them needs help, the other team member can help to accelerate the process of the project. With this in mind, students will be prepared for the challenges in their future careers, and this gives rise to their success and increases their chance to be promoted. Furthermore, they will learn to share their ideas and how to brainstorm to do the project swiftly and properly.
Another reason for accepting this opinion has to do with learning responsibility and organization. It is crystal clear that when a task is divided into two parts, the person has the responsibility to do it properly in a reasonable time. In this regard, students will learn the concepts of responsibility and organization. They will learn how to manage their time to do their tasks with great attention and dedication. It is worth mentioning that students will be cognizant that if one of them did not work very well, the whole group would fail on account of the fact that members are the cornerstones of the group, and there is a famous sentence stating that " all members of a group are in the same boat". In this regard, students should consider themselves as one person that making effort for reaching a goal. Hence, they should be determined to do their tasks properly.
All in all, with all this taken into account, I vehemently subscribe to the view that students learn more when they work together on the grounds that students will learn the concept of coworking and they will understand that they should be responsible and organized to be successful in life. A group is like a ship that approaching a beach that without the contribution of its members never reaches its destination.
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 71
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 73
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree:When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83958333333 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79499102438 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454166666667 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4587882487 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.15 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293153884192 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992638472539 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617783041685 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199244546208 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534878971468 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.