Tpo 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time
People have different opinions about project management. Some hold the view that working on several projects simultaneously increases the efficiency, since one can use its time optimally. However, others believe that concentrating on a project and finishing come up with a better result. I strongly agree with latter group opinion that working on a certain project has undeniable advantages.
Working on one project decreases the amount of fault. As a matter of fact, dealing with a single project increase the one’s concentration that is the main factor to reduce the chance of mistake. As we know,the reduction of concentration reduces person's attention to possible faults. Accordingly, it leads the person to a situation to face with a problem without preparation. Consequently, the chance of mistake increase. However, if the person concentrates in a certain project, he has more attention to the future situation, so he can predict the further difficulties and make himself prepared for those situations. To sum up, the person concentration is higher during working in one project.
Finishing a project helps the person to be more successful in next project. Indeed, a person proud of himself by finishing a project that increases person’s motivation for success in future projects. Accordingly, working on one project is a short term goal increases person's tendency to success and reduces its tiredness. As a psychological theory, seeing the successful result of a project encourages the person for future achievement. On the other hand, assume a person who works on several projects at the same time. This person can see the project result in longer time, which can cause frustration during the projects. This frustration disrupts the process of projects and may lead projects to trouble.
To put it into a nutshell, I strongly believe that a person achieves a better result by working on project separately. Thi situation reduces the chance of fault in the project. Moreover, the person's tendency to success increases during concentration in one project. In my opinion, companies should consider the benefit of single project and ask their employee to work on a single project.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | neda77aa | 3 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | neda77aa | 3 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | Morteza1990 | 66 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | amininilooffar | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | M.S 2019 | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...reduce the chance of mistake. As we know,the reduction of concentration reduces pers...
^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... of fault in the project. Moreover, the persons tendency to success increases during co...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies should consider the benefit of single project and ask their employee to...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mployee to work on a single project.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'consequently', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact', 'in my opinion', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269521410579 0.229887763892 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.130982367758 0.158761421928 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0755667506297 0.0866891130778 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0327455919395 0.046263068375 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0327455919395 0.0685040099705 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133501259446 0.118717715034 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0302267002519 0.0351676179071 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.05096506567 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0302267002519 0.0309702414327 98% => OK
Particles: 0.00503778337531 0.00188951952338 267% => OK
Determiners: 0.120906801008 0.0887237588012 136% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151133501259 0.0209618222197 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0100755667506 0.0139019557991 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2208.0 2387.08602151 92% => OK
No of words: 348.0 408.028673835 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.34482758621 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48200974243 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.477011494253 0.338922669872 141% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.364942528736 0.251872472559 145% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227011494253 0.174417080927 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146551724138 0.112833075102 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05096506567 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488505747126 0.524397521467 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.675601936 59.2087087015 86% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.8181818182 20.5533526081 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3435788024 48.84282405 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.363636364 120.699889404 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 20.5533526081 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.644075263715 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 52.3124346917 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.20512820513 1.45489161554 152% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370602147009 0.300154397459 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109814326643 0.103427244359 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0734454443473 0.0752933317313 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.505324941198 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0968165726311 0.151897553556 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149877695729 0.114077575197 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483923212583 0.0781384742642 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.41741446715 0.336927656856 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.119726251286 0.067059652881 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27171361162 0.210909579961 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344752416214 0.0618886996521 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.