Job security is an inevitable part of everyone’s life because people financially dependent on their jobs to secure their life. In the past decade, as time has passed, people have seen enormous changes that happened in their career perspectives. In this regard, many people think that finding a job that ensures job security and a successful career is challenging. On the other hand, there is another group of people who consider it as an exaggeration and apparently, hold the opposite view of point. Admittedly, from my vantage point, the former view contains more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that with the emergence of new technology, it is hard to find a job since the technology has gradually started replacing human power. To be more specific, developing technology can work precisely without human guidance such as robotic invention, programming in the software, and neural networking system. On the contrary, in earlier days, indeed, humans used to hold the entire working industry. For instance, nowadays, in the medical field, robots are replacing the doctors and nursing staff where robots can operate on patients in the operation theatre without taking any help from doctors and nursing staff. Hence, apparently, despite the fact of having an enormous amount of knowledge in the field of medicine, doctors are losing their job very quickly.
Another noteworthy point is that in the modern era, the majority of individuals prefer to pursue higher education and complete their degree with a specialization. Accordingly, competitions among individuals have been increased in order to secure their jobs. Furthermore, employees are expected to work constantly to serve their best performance in their workplace, and the employees who fail to work serve this purpose would quickly lose their job positions. On the other side, in earlier times, it was easier to stick with one job for a whole life. My father is a compelling example of this. He worked as a software engineer in the same firm for at least more than 30 years in his life since there were not enough people who completed their higher degree in the field of engineering. Therefore, it was easier for people to sustain themselves in one workplace for a longer duration of time.
Lastly, having discussed the issue from this point of view, I rather look at it from another standpoint. Admittedly, it is harder to get a successful job nowadays, however, companies are always in search of people who would work efficiently with full of enthusiasm. The company would never leave those types of precious employees from their firms. Thus, working in the field of interest and handling all the tasks efficiently would make it much easier for people to sustain longer in the firm.
All in all, from contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that it is hard for people to find a secured job position in current scenarios. This is because there is an increasing number of job applicants who compete for the same job positions and because technological inventions have started replacing the need of mankind.
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to use your own knowledge and experience to solve problems than ask other for advice 73
- whether should parents tell their children to choose a major leading to a good job with a high salary or to follow a major in which they are interested in 73
- When you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used e g donate money on food or service or leave the decision to the organizations 90
- TPO 38 independent agree or not leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader 81
- TPO 39 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, look, so, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77220726788 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6939547424 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95833333333 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133967109769 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429305004783 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375192249383 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780333703421 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269843227716 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.