Teaching used to be a highly respected profession but it doesn't seem that way anymore. Although education is still valued, teachers are not appreciated as much as they used to be. That lack of appreciation can be attributed to the way kids are being educated these days and the decline in the quality of teachers who teach at schools.
In the past, the knowledge was mostly gained through a teacher who used provide guidance. For that, a teacher used to hold a respectable position in a society. Parents used to rely on the teachers to guide their kids to achieve success in their lives. In the age of internet, kids rely on online classes, Youtube videos, Wikipedia where kids don't have direct interaction with the person posting the content. The focus is more on the content rather than the content provider which dehumanizes a teacher and hence the appreciation.
Teachers used to be role models for wise, sincere, reliable and responsible individuals. As the sources of knowledge increased, parents stopped relying on the teachers to educate their kids. The focus shifted to using online sources which often gave a false sense of access to reliable limitless information. This reduced the focus on the role of a teacher and the appreciation for the role. Teachers today earn less than minimum wages in some states. Imagine highly educated individuals working for less than minimum wage.
Teaching as a profession would transform into a totally different experience in the digital age and I hope teachers would find their former glory in this new age.
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 60
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 70
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...be a highly respected profession but it doesnt seem that way anymore. Although educati...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s, Youtube videos, Wikipedia where kids dont have direct interaction with the person...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 261.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00766283525 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6704348679 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55938697318 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4512674184 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1333333333 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.45110844103 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10358135931 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406216664903 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276587237462 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593019202563 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024136939767 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.