By and large, it is established beyond doubt that efficiency is the most irreplaceable factor in every company or factory which should be managed through different ways. In today's world, however, there is a heated controversy as to whether employees' job satisfaction grows by the day, when they do a variety of tasks all work hours. Among significant divergence of attitudes toward this controversial issue, I personally believe that the most optimal way to increase the satisfaction of the workers is doing different sort of tasks. I will completely elaborate on two outstanding reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point worth mentioning is that it helps to increase the happiness of the employees. To illustrate this, it is indisputable fact that through hiring multitask employees, it is achievable a higher efficiency for the whole of the company. Consequently, it leads to decrease in overall expenditure of the company. Therefore, workers can receive more salary. As a result become happier, because they can afford their life's costs and do not worry about primary needs of life.
Moreover, happier workers can, in turn, improve their efficiency individually. So, this leads to doing more tasks with high energy. Consequently, the overall workload of the company is reduced by doing multiple tasks through fewer workers and in less time.
Second, from a psychological point of view, workers who are single task can interact with their professional and multitask coworkers during their workday. By doing this they can learn new skills when they face challenging situations. In addition, this is an ideal opportunity for everyone and also for the company that utilizes all the abilities of their employees to enhance company's efficiency. Any individual who works in this situation can be more satisfying, because they become master in the variety of the field gradually, and it guarantees their future' job. Indeed, they can be sure that they are capable of doing different jobs. This means that they do not need to worry about a situation that they should work in another company in the future.
All in all, taking all the aforementioned into account, as far as the satisfaction of workers is concerned, it is highly suggested that employees doing some sort of tasks rather than a single repeatedly task which is boring for them. In addition, a bored worker can lead to decrease in overall efficiency and finally failure of the company. Therefore, in my viewpoint, it is better to do the different task by workers during their workday.
- Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 76
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 73
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 91
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... however, there is a heated controversy as to whether employees job satisfaction grows by the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, as to, in addition, sort of, as a result, by and large, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1726618705 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89648741886 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501199040767 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0098328789 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307325361608 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958535441008 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830424438449 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182951021872 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662590198541 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.