Since the dawn of civilization, people have been concerned about their jobs and occupations. By the advent of technology, owing to the fact that jobs have gotten more complex, this concern have culminated. The debates came to consider the satisfaction of the jobs as an important factor. In this regard, there is a prevailing controversy amongst people that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Personally speaking, I am not in favor of this remark. I assert my viewpoint for two reasons and will illustrate them in the following.
The first aspect to be mentioned is by concentrating on only one task and doing it over and over, a worker is able to become master in that specific task hence, that task will become an easy one for him. To be more clear, one is more satisfied with an easy and not challenging task than with a complex challenging task. On the other hand, doing many different tasks requires more effort and can be more difficult due to the point that they are new to the workers. To put this in a more vivid picture, take a worker in a mine as an example, if he was given a unique task of digging the ground every day, after a while, he finds this task easy and satisfying. On the other hand, if he has to do different things he becomes confused and cannot accomplish his duties.
Apart from the point discussed above, let me asset this debate from the standpoint of mental effects. While a person who has a unique task to do is more relaxed, the worker with different tasks to do is confused and does not feel he is able to accomplish his duties. In other words, doing so many tasks in on day makes the workers feel less satisfied than doing a unique task over and over in one day. To convey my notion, take a scientific fact as a reason, scientists have illustrated that it is easier for people to be engaged with a unique task during a specific period of time. They point out the facet of the comfort zone and defines it as the tendency that people have to stay in a fix situation. This fact strongly indicates the fact that doing a similar task over and over again in one they are more be liked by the workers. In contrast, doing so many tasks in one day requires to come out of the comfort zone which is not easy and wanted by most people.
All in all, according to the aforementioned points and examples, I cling to the opinion that doing similar tasks has more satisfaction for workers than doing different tasks in one day. However, there are opposing viewpoints that it is more satisfying for workers to do different tasks in a day. They declare their idea by the fact that diversity always makes tasks more interesting but from the standpoint of scientific facts and experience, I am willing to conclude that doing similar tasks is more likely to be considered as a satisfaction by workers than doing different types of tasks in one workday.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...llenging task. On the other hand, doing many different tasks requires more effort and can be m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ed with a unique task during a specific period of time. They point out the facet of the comfor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 887, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'coming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: coming
...doing so many tasks in one day requires to come out of the comfort zone which is not ea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, while, apart from, as to, in contrast, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4926199262 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53583741569 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39667896679 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6119784125 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.952380952 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8095238095 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504006560102 0.236089414692 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172171166064 0.076458572812 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155745563104 0.0737576698707 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366188835134 0.150856017488 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563121938775 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.