tpo-43
From a general standpoint, no one can cast doubt on the fact that there always is a chance to making mistakes by teachers or lecturers since they should present a plentitude of things in a relatively short time. With this in mind, it is not surprising to notice that like all prominent issues, its facets is subject to discussion and debate. For example, how should we react when we are finding something said by our teacher wrong has been a subject of controversy. There are many alternatives ideas in this regard, 3 of which are interrupting and correcting the mistake, waiting until the class is over and then talk to the teacher and saying nothing. I personally believe the first idea sounds better. In what follows, the rationale for this opinion will be elaborated by focusing on 2 reasons.
One reason worth mentioning here at first is that correcting the mistake right away help other students to understand and learn the correct concept. Should we wait until the end of the meeting or do not say at all, other participants in that meeting will learn an incorrect matter; thus, we are responsible too since we are ones who detect the mistake. My friend's experience may shed light on my point of view. Last year he was attending in an optional class about literature that he already had a brief knowledge about it. In one class the teacher said the name of a particular author wrongly. My friend found that he made a mistake and corrected him right away. When the teacher noticed what a mistake he made apologized and repeated the correct name to become ensure that all the students understood the right name.
The second reason that occurs to my mind is that it is possible that we are ones who make mistake and think the meeting leader says something wrong. In such a case, stating our opinion right away and expressing the idea that something teacher has just said may be wrong can help us to learn the topic correctly. For example, last semester in the chemistry class I thought my teacher had mentioned the wrong element based on his description of its properties. When I express my opinion and he answered me, I found that I completely misunderstood the topic. If I had wanted to wait until the class was over, I would not have understood other successive topics effectively.
In conclusion, it is more judicious to say that interrupting and correcting the teacher's mistake right away sounds better not only does this approach help other students learn correct thins but it also helps us to become sure about the authenticity of our knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to correct'
Suggestion: to correct
...this approach help other students learn correct thins but it also helps us to become su...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72706935123 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6348833357 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505592841163 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3489559541 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.210526316 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.