TPO 43: Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
All of us have experienced that during a meeting an instructor or lecturer says something incorrect. Different people have a different reaction in these situations. some are indifferent about it, but others try to correct it and give notice the lecturer about his/her mistake during or after the meeting or class. In such situations, I prefer to talk about it in person after the class at the instructor's office. There are some reasons that support my idea regarding this issue and in the following paragraph, I will elaborate on my point of view.
One of the most important points to be mentioned is that for every individual it is important to maintain his/her dignity and they have a particular sensitivity about this issue. For instance, some students directly mention the teacher's mistakes during the class. They do this on purpose in order to cast doubt on the teacher's knowledge. It is not a polite manner and sometimes makes the teacher or speaker embarrassed. most of the teacher find it a rude an offensive behavior and it leads to having a negative mindset about that student. In some case, it will cause that teacher to hold a biased viewpoint about that student's performance which may have negative impacts on the student's grades. Hence, I believe it is better to behave in a wise manner and politely talk about the mistake with the instructor in an appropriate time after the class.
Secondly, interrupting the teacher and mentioning his/her mistakes would take the time of the class and consequently, the teacher would not be able to finish the topic in due time or thoroughly clarify the topic for students, hence, it would decrease the teaching quality. As a personal experience, when I was a high school student, one of my classmates used to notice every minor mistake say it out loudly. It was irritating and bothersome as it would always distract other student attention and usually, the teacher could not finish the topic on a session.
In conclusion, it is advisable to talk about such mistakes after the meeting or class in order not to embarrass the lecturer in front of other audience and also do not waste the allocated time hence, the lecturer could be able to clarify all of the outlines.
- TPO 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- TPO30: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
- TPO 44 73
- TPO 41: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO 21: independent writing task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...different reaction in these situations. some are indifferent about it, but others tr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructors'' or 'instructor's'?
Suggestion: instructors'; instructor's
...out it in person after the class at the instructors office. There are some reasons that sup...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...n purpose in order to cast doubt on the teachers knowledge. It is not a polite manner an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...kes the teacher or speaker embarrassed. most of the teacher find it a rude an offens...
^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...r to hold a biased viewpoint about that students performance which may have negative imp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wise manner" with adverb for "wise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...Hence, I believe it is better to behave in a wise manner and politely talk about the mistake wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
..., the lecturer could be able to clarify all of the outlines.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70308636567 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471052631579 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1859895078 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1875 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149755732955 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052767176326 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355192304555 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921912280067 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141451289863 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.