We live in a society and it is important to learn how to behave properly in social gatherings. For educational and professional reasons, we attend classes and official meetings. It is crucial to know how to be polite, courteous and amiable at those events. As a human, teacher or meeting leader can make mistakes and people might choose to say nothing or correct mistakes right way. I personally prefer to wait for the right moment and talk to the teacher or meeting leader after the meeting for three compelling reasons.
To begin with, we do not know intention of the speaker. In some scenario, it might happen that the speaker says something intentionally. So, without having the idea about background of that matter or knowing what is going on lecturer's mind while discussing on some topic, it would not be wise to interrupt and say my opinion loudly. For instance, in our company, every year higher management fixes a certain criteria to evaluate single project's contribution. According to this criteria, we have to propose 3 new project ideas in this year. However, in team meeting, our leader said that we have to propose 5 ideas to achieve good grade. Though it was incorrect information, it was said intentionally to set the bar higher for team members.
Second point that comes to my mind is that, it is not judicious to hamper the flow of a meeting. It is often happen that the mistake in lecture is not directly related to main topic or target idea of discussion. Therefore, we must ignore those minor mistakes which are irrelevant to the topic. Rather we should let the lecturer continue and keep current flow to bring up the main topic and finish discussion session on time. To illustrate this I would like to share my experience of attending a training session yesterday. The session was about a programming algorithm and he points out some real life experience to describe that concept. One student pointed out a mistake in that story and hinder the flow of speaking and consequently the speaker failed to finish his topic while trying to convince the students about the mistake which was totally irrelevant.
Finally, all person has dignity and we should not embarrass a person in public places. If we think that the speaker makes a mistake, we should wait until the meeting is over and later we can discuss or inform him/her about that. If our opinion is correct, then the speaker can notify his/her students or members about the mistakes via mail or in next class.
Simply put, it is fairly safe to draw the conclusion that it is wise to keep patience and discuss with speaker later about his/her probable mistakes and then take proper steps later to fix that.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 62
- TPO37Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
... year higher management fixes a certain criteria to evaluate single projects contributio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...gle projects contribution. According to this criteria, we have to propose 3 new proj...
^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...akes which are irrelevant to the topic. Rather we should let the lecturer continue and...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssion yesterday. The session was about a programming algorithm and he points out ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78924731183 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5778425642 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531182795699 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5588559251 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8260869565 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2173913043 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13527165332 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390746430019 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515204749335 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713949843485 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460266278419 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.