According to the article, genetic modification process can be used for improvement of trees and the author presents several advantages of plantation of genetically modified tress, However, the professor refutes the points presented in lecture providing some counter arguments.
First of all, the author posits that survival chance of genetically modified tress is much greater compared to unmodified counterparts. On contrast, the lecturer challenges this argument saying that it may be true in some particular scenarios only. She also mentions that unmodified trees holds varieties of genetical states and chance of survival is greater in case of drastic climate change or deleterious effect of insects of pests. As, genetically modified tree is specially created considering general cases, it might fail to survive against dramatic changes.
Secondly, the author points out to the economical benefits of genetically moderated trees as farmer can get faster and greater return on investment. On the other hand, the professor explains that hidden costs are associated with this process which causes decline in profit. As farmer need to pay a considerable amount of money for seeds and can not collect seeds by their own, it would increase farming cost and consequently a reduction in profit.
Finally, the author brings up the idea of preventing over usage of wild trees and save endangered species by using genetically modified trees. The speaker disagrees with this idea and asserts that native trees would be damaged by moderated trees as they grow aggressively and out-compete normal trees from getting natural resources. Thus, the professor contends that these special trees would eventually destroy native trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... Secondly, the author points out to the economical benefits of genetically moderated trees...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nefits of genetically moderated trees as farmer can get faster and greater return...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 264.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79610118168 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8586071777 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203797418248 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074441651559 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494570111321 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123526284949 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433568826681 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.