Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that the interrupted of class or a meeting because ofd the teacher or the leader making some mistake during speaking know as inacceptable or impolite behavior. Contrary to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that each of mistake that produced in a scientific discussion should be corrected as soon as possible because can transmit incorrect information to listeners and craete some mistake in their mind. I, to agreat extent dis agree with this idea that interruption of a discussion just for a little mistake is unreasonable.
First and foremost, trying to inform or revising the possible mistake in the class led to distracted all of other student or listeners. For example, whe I was in high school, during biology class one of student most of the time cuting the our teacher lecture to ask question or explain some point that she think it is incorrect in teacher's lectur. But, most of students were upset from her behavior because she led to distract all of student and we could not keeping our attention to the class. She was also, surely distracted our teacher and may be she forgot some of her important points. And in this shape we lost some more important information in the class.
On another significant fact that should be taken into the consideration is that based on our culture and ethic it is better to if we think there is a mistake in teacher or a leader speech we keep it in our mind and later talk about this view to them. Because based on our believes even we sure that an oldrer person says somethingh not true, we should not explain it in the front of a large number of peole because it can be led to decrease in value of the leader between others.
Finally, yet importantly, finding mistake from teachers led to decreas their interest to explain new details in the class. becuase they feeling that may be other people do not like to learn about new unfamiliar information. beacuse most of them time the idea that primery we think it is not true, at the end of the lecture we find out that it is not actually mistake.But, we have not enough knowledge about it.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that we should not interrupted or correct the teacher or leader mistake in front of others. because it is distract listeners and it is not politely behavior.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or not?Because people are busy doing so many things, they do very few things well. 76
- TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 11 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
... one of student most of the time cuting the our teacher lecture to ask question or expl...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...t is incorrect in teachers lectur. But, most of students were upset from her behavior because sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 459, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'keep'
Suggestion: keep
...istract all of student and we could not keeping our attention to the class. She was als...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...also, surely distracted our teacher and may be she forgot some of her important points...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...this view to them. Because based on our believes even we sure that an oldrer person says...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e should not explain it in the front of a large number of peole because it can be led to decrease...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Becuase
...st to explain new details in the class. becuase they feeling that may be other people d...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beacuse
...learn about new unfamiliar information. beacuse most of them time the idea that primery...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...ind out that it is not actually mistake.But, we have not enough knowledge about it....
^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'interrupt'
Suggestion: interrupt
...bove, I am convinced that we should not interrupted or correct the teacher or leader mistak...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...r or leader mistake in front of others. because it is distract listeners and it is not ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64354066986 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57519967195 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476076555024 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.903712713 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.4 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8666666667 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113327178791 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441992328396 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415729610498 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076641028505 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411409046193 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.