In my experience as a student, it is happened a few times to have a different opinion from the teacher holding the class. I do not usually interrupt the lesson, but if I think it is very important for the understanding of the topic, I do. Every time I retained that something incorrect was said and would have prevented myself to understand or follow the teacher reasoning, I arose my hand up, and ask for explanations.
First, I believe that if I have a doubt about what it is being explained, many other students could have the same question, therefore, interrupt the lesson and pointing out the something it is not clear or need to have a better explanation may help the classroom as a whole. Sometimes students think to be in disagreement with teachers just because they do not wholly understand what they are listening or they find difficult to follow complex arguments which need to be explained with other words or examples.
Second, another reason why I retain to interrupt the lesson is when I do not really understand something or I believe that, for example, a phenomenon can be explained differently from how it is presented, this is very useful for me to follow the reasoning and have a complete idea of what I am learning to. If an idea comes up in my mind and it is different from the one of the teacher, I need to know what the teacher thinks about it, this is because a believes that during lectures it is very important to interact with the teachers in order to have interesting discussions that could improve the overall understand of the topic of the lesson.
Finally, I believe that interruptions as long as they are very short and used to really ask for explanations or to expose a different point of views, are very useful for the entire classroom and not annoying at all. On the contrary, if you need for a longer explanation or you are totally in disagreement with the teacher, in my opinion, is it better to say nothing during the lecture, and talk to the teacher when the class is over and the people are gone.
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 76
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 80
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...cher thinks about it, this is because a believes that during lectures it is very importa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5625 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75920947822 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464673913043 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.1344086022 199% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1948666141 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.555555556 100.406767564 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.8888888889 20.6045352989 198% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5555555556 5.45110844103 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1385726504 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684942019093 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025228711007 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948438805666 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219917407944 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 11.7677419355 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.06 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.0537634409 179% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.