tpo 44 Q2
It is indubitably axiomatic that education is of vital importance in the development of each country, and university professors play an important role in the prosperity of each society. However, there might be some minor or major mistakes during their classes. While there are some people believe that the mistake should be revised spontaneously or do not say anything about the probable issue, there are others holding the idea that it is better to talk to the teacher after the class, As far as I am concerned, I would rather mention the mistake and talk to the teacher after the class. The vital aspects of this behavior are demonstrated a great number of issues, among which feeling better and learning more are of great consequences, which are discussed hereunder.
The first point which should be stated here is that they would keep their confidence. As it is clear, human beings are consistently looking for respect of others, and the teachers also spend most of their time and dedicate all their life to gain this respect. if the students are rude toward their teachers and interrupt their classes, their teacher might feel upset. For example, when I was in the university, we had a professor who taught basic chemistry and also spent a lot of time to provide a useful assignment for us. But, most of the time he mentioned controversial points, and the students tended to correct the mistakes right away. After about 6 months, this interruption culminated in severe arguments which were not friendly. Therefore, the professor felt fruitless and quit his job. Had students talk to him after the class, the professor would have felt being respected.
The other point which deserves some words here is that the students can learn much better. It is possible for the education system to be improved through the interconnection between the students and the teachers. The students can share their ideas with their teachers as well as mention the probable issues of the class and enhance the quality of education. I remember I read somewhere that based on a study, students who give an advice to their teachers are more successful than those who do not say anything. It is mainly because of the fact that if teachers get noticed that there are some mistakes in their teaching, they will more likely to correct their mistake by increasing their knowledge to do their all the best in the class and make the students satisfied. On the other hand, if the students do not say anything, teachers will not be able to know that there are some problems and continue their wrong way. As can be seen from the abovementioned facts, notice the problem after the class has some benefits for the education system.
To sum up, regarding all the aforementioned reasons, I am in consummate accord with the notion that it is better to talk to the teacher about a mistake after the class. Not only is it more respectful toward the teacher, but also it is helpful for students to grasp their courses effectively. It is proposed to neither be indifference nor rude in the classes and talk to the teacher whenever the class has finished.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...te all their life to gain this respect. if the students are rude toward their teac...
^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'advice'.
Suggestion: advice
...hat based on a study, students who give an advice to their teachers are more successful t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...e who do not say anything. It is mainly because of the fact that if teachers get noticed that there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2591.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 536.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83395522388 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6334554968 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466417910448 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9467566793 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.772727273 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.