In today's modern world, the process of publishing news and information is more convenient in comparison to that of the past, andthere are a gerat deal of new resources such as newspapers and Internet, which has altered human beings' thinkings. With this in mind, some believe that it stands to reason that individuals should be aware of what happens around them although incidents cannot influence their lives, while others hold the opposite view. I, personally, subscribe to the firts attitude based on quite a few reasons, two of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that in today's world, every company has to be in rush so as not to be left behind in contending for the "field of competition", and they strive more and more not only to keep their market share, but also to promore their posintion in their markets, which brings them about fortune. In this regard, innovation plays a pivotal role in acquiring more market share and enjoying consistent competetive advantage. In order to be innovative, corporations are required to survey their sroundings in a careful manner. Being a ware of what happens around them gives them a chance to determine opportunities and theri market's needs, and then exploit those effectively opportunities, which leads to making profit and consistent competitive adavantage. In addition, given the existing economic situation and today's unexpected and highly competitive environment, companies are required to be more conservative regarding their decisions and evaluate their environemnts before making decisions.t Unless they know about incidents happening around them, they may make decisions that may endanger their life. For example, I read in an article, which its name eludes me at the moment, that manay companies in Iran went bankrupt due to lack of information about the consequences of sanctions imposed to the country.
Another interpreation as to why I do not concur with the latter perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in tha fact that nowadays, the world is chaning towrad golablization raplidly, and the work is becoming smaller and smaller. Thanks to globalization, people tend to expand their knowldge and their communication. Knowing about what happens around us helps us to have a better communication with people in different coutries. For instance, tourist can know how they should behave in foreign countries if they understand various coutries constums.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that mankind should be know about what happening around them on the grounds that it helps people not only to be more knowledgable, but aslo it gives companies a chance to reach their goals--that is--fortune.
- TPO 19 86
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 70
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 76
- TPO 31 63
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...are required to survey their sroundings in a careful manner. Being a ware of what happens around th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s us to have a better communication with people in different coutries. For instan...
^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'known'?
Suggestion: known
...my point of view that mankind should be know about what happening around them on the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people not only to be more knowledgable, but aslo it gives companies a chance to ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in summary', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220883534137 0.229887763892 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.168674698795 0.158761421928 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0803212851406 0.0866891130778 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0401606425703 0.046263068375 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0682730923695 0.0685040099705 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130522088353 0.118717715034 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0502008032129 0.0351676179071 143% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04035284706 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0401606425703 0.0309702414327 130% => OK
Particles: 0.00602409638554 0.00188951952338 319% => OK
Determiners: 0.0682730923695 0.0887237588012 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140562248996 0.0209618222197 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0240963855422 0.0139019557991 173% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2812.0 2387.08602151 118% => OK
No of words: 444.0 408.028673835 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33333333333 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.403153153153 0.338922669872 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288288288288 0.251872472559 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22972972973 0.174417080927 132% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.177927927928 0.112833075102 158% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04035284706 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.524397521467 110% => OK
Word variations: 70.4865459682 59.2087087015 119% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 31.7142857143 20.5533526081 154% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.1626594901 48.84282405 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 200.857142857 120.699889404 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 20.5533526081 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 60.5431145431 45.7405998639 132% => OK
Elegance: 1.44927536232 1.45489161554 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231128889734 0.300154397459 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0930705865807 0.103427244359 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0446341057654 0.0752933317313 59% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554962565679 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176568873538 0.151897553556 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999548532645 0.114077575197 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622814131359 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.365874858886 0.336927656856 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0900203747601 0.067059652881 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186922724103 0.210909579961 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345149298401 0.0618886996521 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.6433691756 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.