Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past
Without any shadow of a doubt, people are the cornerstone of any successful society; indeed, the more individuals of a country are qualified, the more the country is powerful. With this in mind, there are different views about the level of creativity in children in the past in comparison to that of in the present time. Some believe that it stands to reason that nowadays, children are more creative than that of in the past, while others hold the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the latter attitude carries more weight for several reasons, three of the most substantial of which are discussed below.
The most compelling reason is that in today's modern world, our lifestyle, as it commonly perceived, has been affected by the galloping rate of technology arrival offering more a more convenient life. As everything has become facilitated since childhood, and whatever one wished to have, it would provide in the blink of an eye; a child t is not accustomed to any hardship; also, he or she has lost their motivation to think about what happens around them. However, in the past, everything aroused children's curiosity.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the first perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that as time passes, new technologies and facilities will be offered that can be tempting for everyone. Today, children have access to a great variety of entertainments such as cell phone, computers, Internet. These entertainments are different from those of in the past in one aspect, today's entertainments are addictive. Children spend most of their time playing video games, surfing on net, to name but a few, which inhibits them from playing with others children. On the other hand, previously, children used to play with each other that gave them a chance to invent new games, which improve their learning ability, which is the foundation of creativity.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned ingredients discussed above, I do endorse my point of view that even though technology development has many privileges, it has negatively affected children's creative ability on the grounds that in the past, children not only enjoyed higher thinking ability, but also had more curious spirit. I recommend to parents to strive to limit children' access to technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'in summary', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223502304147 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.158986175115 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0875576036866 0.0866891130778 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0437788018433 0.046263068375 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0414746543779 0.0685040099705 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145161290323 0.118717715034 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0460829493088 0.0351676179071 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89817309366 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0322580645161 0.0309702414327 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00230414746544 0.00188951952338 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.0990783410138 0.0887237588012 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00691244239631 0.0209618222197 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0207373271889 0.0139019557991 149% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2331.0 2387.08602151 98% => OK
No of words: 384.0 408.028673835 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0703125 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369791666667 0.338922669872 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286458333333 0.251872472559 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213541666667 0.174417080927 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145833333333 0.112833075102 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89817309366 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 66.5022168594 59.2087087015 112% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 27.4285714286 20.5533526081 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4012698615 48.84282405 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.5 120.699889404 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 20.5533526081 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.644075263715 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 56.0744047619 45.7405998639 123% => OK
Elegance: 1.69811320755 1.45489161554 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286325543206 0.300154397459 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124163920719 0.103427244359 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0658939123632 0.0752933317313 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.556663248947 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138473266378 0.151897553556 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128053977034 0.114077575197 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729780216637 0.0781384742642 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.333244472135 0.336927656856 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0399452439257 0.067059652881 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209336973426 0.210909579961 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372197628199 0.0618886996521 60% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.