Friends' roll in human kind life is undeniable, since it is an indispencible part of our life to communicate with others. However, people are of two types: some people would rather have fewer friends, and another group prefer to widen their friendship circle and have lots of friends. This issue was a great concern to me when I was teenager, and now I have come to this issue that I think the ability to keep my friendship with a small number but for a long time is essential and makes me happy.
To begin with, it is urgent to learn how to treat with other people, so that you would be able to maintain your relationship with them. Not knowing how to keep our friends, how can we be able to make new friends? Even if a person does find new friends, but does not treat them well, that new friendship would not last long enough, and with a very bad feeling, that person must look for another new relationship.
In addition, I prefer to maintain my older friendship, due to the notion that older friends would do more for us in difficult situations. As a matter of fact, I suppose in difficult situation when a problem comes up, a new friend would not do a lot, since he/she might not know a lot about us. However, an older friend has been in different situations in our lives. And a friend in need, is a friend indeed!
Last but not the least, I believe having a smaller number of friends, we can allocate more time to them. On the other hand, having lots of friends, one might not be able to dedicate enough time to get to know the new friends. It is by spending enough time with our friends that we come to get more and more closer. With small number of close and good friends forever, one certainly will have great happiness in life.
To wrap it up, the ability to make new friends is critical, however we should be able to maintain our relationship with them too. Comparing these two abilities, keeping our friends is much more beneficial in our life, since not having this ability, each time of giving end to a friendship might hurt our feelings. Moreover, as a personal experience, it is our older friends staying in arduous events of our life, helping us to survive and return to the happy life. Finally, spending more time with fewer people leads to a closer relationship with a life filled with joy and happiness.
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
- TPO 45 integrated 3
- TPO 32 – Integrated 80
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 81
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...ur friends that we come to get more and more closer. With small number of close and good fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, i suppose, i think, in addition, as a matter of fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43925233645 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43704469154 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450934579439 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.5258642282 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.764705882 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286898109228 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105705802749 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585714310455 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170222814462 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351132839957 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 58.1214874552 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.