Each society is governed by norms that regulate social relationships among its members, and the nature of those rules is determined by a variety of objective and subjective factors. In that regard, one of the main factors is the perception of the concept of freedom in a society which provides the ideological basis for rules that are expected to be followed by all members of community. At the same time, personally, I am prone to believe that nowadays the boundaries of the youngsters’ rights are wider that they were a few decades ago. I hold this opinion since young people have more rights and freedoms; and sanctions for breaking the rules by the representatives of young generation are softer than they used to be.
To begin with, the catalogue of rights which are exercised by young people has become broader. This is explained by the fact that the contemporary understanding of the idea of freedom implies guaranteeing some basic rights to all generations, and young people are not an exception in that sense. Today they may exercise even political rights from relatively young age and express their opinions about various social and political issues. For example, in my country teenagers may fully exercise the right to peaceful assembly starting from the age of 12. Therefore, in practice, we can see a lot of teenagers who have their own vision not only of their private lives, but also on political, cultural, economic and other issues. Thus, it is a fact that our children are entitled to do more nowadays than we were at their age.
Additionally, the system of legislation which stipulates procedures and punishments for young people who do not follow the rules has transformed radically during the last decades. Both the proceedings and the sanctions are less strict, and they are designed with the aim of considering the young age of delinquent teenagers. For instance, in my country we have incorporated a system of juvenile jurisprudence which is much softer compared to the ordinary proceedings. One of the novelties implemented is the possibility of delinquent youngsters to involve in community services instead of being imprisoned. Consequently, it would be just to state that young people are in a better position nowadays than they would be in the past.
To sum up briefly, the rules for young people become less and less severe. The explanation to this is twofold: first, they exercise more rights nowadays; second; the body of rules relating to their responsibility has become more liberal.
- TPO 54- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
- "Ecocertified" wood for American people 80
- The extended family is less important now than in the past. 66
- TPO 34Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 90
- Eco certification and American wood companies (Integrated)Reading Section: In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological stan 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...responsibility has become more liberal.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04784688995 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93618552078 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507177033493 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7671999154 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.117647059 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5882352941 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171389399093 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563879781429 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496214944885 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109249923699 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329640855603 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.