In this modern era, the Internet plays a pivotal role in boosting people's life quality. It is an indisputable fact that the Internet has turned into an inseparable companion for all of us. Some people are for the opinion that transportation is a more crucial field, that government should pay attention to. However, others believe that improving Internet access should be the top priority of the government's concerns and not improving transportation. I personally agree with the latter idea. I will pinpoint the most significant reasons why I hold this point of view, through the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the Internet is a new technology that still governments have not invested enough in order to enhance people's access to it. However, boosting public transportation has been always a hot debate among the heads of the government. Hence, if any effort was going to be done about public transportation, it should have been done by now. To illustrate, in my country a huge project for improving public transportation was done a few years ago and the quality of the roads and as a result, public vehicles are absolutely better now compared to the past and people are quite satisfied with them. On the contrary, many people are complaining about Internet access. They are mostly among rural people and it is not fair that the Internet is accessible to the urban community and rural people are still willing to experience using it even for once.
Second exquisite point to be mentioned is the importance of the Internet. The essential role of the Internet and it’s strong impacts on our lives is not deniable. The Internet has contributed to education, medical care, and even transportation and extremely enhanced the quality of all of them. To illustrate, these days students use the Internet to learn about various topics using online books, articles and, even online courses. For instance, I learned computer programming only by the help of the Internet and now compared to my friends who have studied computer programming in the university I am a brilliant programmer and a lot of job opportunities have been proposed to me.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons indicate that the Internet is worth investing and improving its quality should be among the government's priorities. All the people, despite where they live should have access to the Internet. This way a general advancement in the society's status will be observed soon.
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing 3
- Tpo 53 Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 70
- The government should support research even if it has no practical use? 85
- TPO 53 Integrated Writing Tasks 68
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, so, still, for instance, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07371007371 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93145209236 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6366177577 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.35 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251224162863 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793793177497 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568618916137 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15765843791 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551553718537 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.