Most people respect teachers because of their knowledge and thoughts. They are patient and kind with their students and tolerate every hardship to teach pupils. The strong relationship between teacher and students makes it a good way for illustrating political or social views. Although some people assert that the induction of teachers’ opinions to students is very good, others believe that it has a lot of disadvantages. In my opinion, a good teacher is who that teach students how think rather than what think.
First of all, the foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that human makes mistakes and there is no exception. If a teacher train his opinions to students, they would learn a mixture of negative and positive ideas. It is logical that we want to raise children who are better than us and if they think the same as our generation, they cannot develop the world. Parents wish to decrease false behaviors and increase correct ones. Hence, it is very important to avoid teaching political views to students.
Moreover, another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that the process of thinking is more significant than thoughts. The society needs people who can invent and discover new rules and criticize issues. Nobody wants to have children without the sense of challenging ideas. If teachers focus on their own standpoint and compel pupils to accept them, in hard decisions, they cannot find the best solution. So, far from our ideas, students should discover the right and wrong.
Admittedly there are some advantages of showing teachers’ social view to students. For example, ethics principles are very important and mentors can help them to understand them. Nevertheless, this worry can eliminated by safe experiences in the community. For instance, if we anticipate an honest child, we can show him the bad result of lies. Therefore, it is not necessary that teachers concentrate on accepted laws.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I recommend that professors assist students to analyze everything without any bias.
- The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are around 2 000 year 80
- Choose one of the following transportation vehicles and explain why you think it has changed people's lives.1. Automobiles 2. Bicycles 3.AirplanesUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO26 - Integrated TOEFL essay 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 90
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning w 95
Essay evaluation report
a good teacher is who that teach students how think rather than what think.
good teachers are those who teach students how think rather than what think.
If a teacher train his opinions
If a teacher trains his opinions
Sentence: Nevertheless, this worry can eliminated by safe experiences in the community.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to can and eliminated
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 345 350
No. of Characters: 1714 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.31 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.968 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.629 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.315 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.268 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.268 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.059 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance', 'first of all', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233766233766 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.150649350649 0.158761421928 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0987012987013 0.0866891130778 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.038961038961 0.046263068375 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0727272727273 0.0685040099705 106% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114285714286 0.118717715034 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0181818181818 0.0351676179071 52% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74091039475 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0337662337662 0.0309702414327 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0779220779221 0.0887237588012 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0233766233766 0.0209618222197 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155844155844 0.0139019557991 112% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2108.0 2387.08602151 88% => OK
No of words: 345.0 408.028673835 85% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11014492754 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48200974243 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388405797101 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289855072464 0.251872472559 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223188405797 0.174417080927 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130434782609 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74091039475 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.524397521467 116% => OK
Word variations: 71.6662650753 59.2087087015 121% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.4285714286 20.5533526081 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4687042238 48.84282405 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.380952381 120.699889404 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 20.5533526081 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 45.4140786749 45.7405998639 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.39603960396 1.45489161554 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199843617431 0.300154397459 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0606003153108 0.103427244359 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0379571855237 0.0752933317313 50% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.463629247126 0.497263757937 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140382880317 0.151897553556 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752006471146 0.114077575197 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565116669388 0.0781384742642 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.292537322158 0.336927656856 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.110101896826 0.067059652881 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130083685037 0.210909579961 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351368466025 0.0618886996521 57% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.