TPO2
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Agree or disagree?
Although every relation has certain rules and considerations for itself, no one can turn a blind eye to the importance of truthfulness in retaining it. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that telling the truth is the most significant cornerstone in any relationship. On the other extreme of the rope, others believe that occasionally people have to tell a lie in some particular situations. Although both sides take their positions, personally speaking, I think that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, a relationship based on truthfulness promotes confidence and respect between members. In other words, people prefer to communicate with persons who are honest and faithful and try to stand by their reliable friend's sides in various difficult situations. For instance, two years ago, one of my brothers completing industrial projects for an international company declared personal bankruptcy due to a lack of government funding and runaway inflation. He asked me to loan him a lot of money for a short time. Since he has never been hidden any reality from me and his family, and he always tells truth, I accepted his request immediately without any stress that my money will be returned or not. Moreover, numerous manufacturers knew my brother as a reliable and loyal employer; thus, the managers of that company authorized him to complete those projects latter. Accordingly, he could accomplish his tasks and duties properly and efficiently and made a lot of profit. If he had been known as a liar man, neither could he borrow money from me, nor fulfill his tasks and gain a lot of money.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that if people be honest with their friends, they can build a remarkably consistent and constructive relationship having amazing advantages. To be more specific, although there are different conflicts in any relationship; however, members being honest with each other put a lot of effort to settle disagreements to protect their relation against any problems. They also contribute to each other to follow their dreams because they firmly believe every word their friends say. For example, empirical research conducted by some business and sociology students shows that in today’s competitive world, the biggest and most successful companies have been established by engineers having close interaction and consistent relationships with each other for a long time. They obviously know that all issues are real and not hidden; subsequently, there is not any fraud, larceny, and disloyalty; consequently, they can trust each other and retain this relationship for a long time and take advantage of this effective situation to improve their economic performance. Hence, the more people don’t conceal any subject from each other, the more they will be a success in their friendship.
In conclusion, taking the above reasons into account, I strongly believe that not only does behavior based on honesty increase confidence between people, but it also encourages them to resolve their conflict, increase the scope of their friendship and build a productive long-term relationship which has great achievements for them.
- TPO1Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 73
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? 73
- Do you agree or disagree: The way people dressed is a good indication of his or her personality or character. 73
- TPO11- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Has the ease of cooking improved life? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2798.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 532.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25939849624 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96398175241 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558270676692 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 854.1 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3648898269 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.9 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160531702469 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504371422739 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067130783767 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101291391509 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451021401292 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.