Working hour is directly related to the productivity of the workers. Some companies set a long working hour per day and a few days per week whereas, others make their rule that allows a shorter working hour per day relatively more days per week. Personally, I believe that it is better to work shorter hours for more days per week. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, shorter working hours per day allows workers to do their job more actively so that the productivity of the employees can be increased. Shorter the working hour per day, employees will feel less depressed due to the working load. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. 10 years ago, I worked in a CG company. I had to work 12 hours per day and 3 days per week. This caused me a lot of trouble and depressed, as a result, I had made a decision to leave my job and searched for a new job. I was able to get a job in the next company, where, I have to work 6 hours per day and 5 days per week, which I continue till this date. So, it is better to set rules and regulations so that the employees are able to continue their job and perform their tasks with greater efforts.
Secondly, longer working hours per day have a negative impact on the health of the individual worker. Longer hours per day to work, workers feel discomfort, which might result in serious health problems in the later stage. For instance, 5 years ago, my friend, Balaram Chalise worked in a hospital, where he had to work 14 hours per day and 2 days per week. Initially, there were not any health issues, but with the passage of time, he suffered from mental disorders and nowadays he take bed rest. So, even if the symptoms are not present immediately, but longer working hours per day might have negative consequences on the health in the long run.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that shorter working hours per day for many days per week is far more better than the long working hour per day for fewer days per week. This is because shorter working hours per day enables workers to feel more energetic and act accordingly and because longer working hours per day may cause serious health issues in the workers.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 68
- Tpo30 Integrated 73
- Tpo41 professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial 63
- Rembrandt s painting 65
- TPO12 Integrated Writing 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urs per day and 5 days per week, which I continue till this date. So, it is bette...
^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...d from mental disorders and nowadays he take bed rest. So, even if the symptoms are ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...s per day for many days per week is far more better than the long working hour per day for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42233009709 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40383918588 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43932038835 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7238881317 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8947368421 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390145267255 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167042350601 0.076458572812 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999033649293 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306173813349 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291381479708 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.