TPO36
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Among numerous aspects including technology, economy and law, the society is seeking for improvement. Nowadays, more emphasis is put on education and there is a fierce debate about where the government should spend the money. With regard to this question, I am against the statement that funding on young children would be more beneficial than on university for the following reasons.
To begin with, the advancement of the society is largely dependent on the researches and achievements produced by the universities. Univerisity is a place for professors and students to apply the knowledge in practical life to solve real life problems with creative approaches. However, the researches usually requires a huge amount of money and reducing the funding would discourage students to go to universities, causing the loss their extraordinary ideas which may reduce the emergence of new products and companies.
In addition, spending less money on universities would diminish the potential talents of all fields in the future. If the society needs to make progress, it needs talents with different backgrounds, those are exactly the students receiving higher education in the universities, preparing for their professional career. With less money, the quality of the higher order education would decrease due to possible lack of faculties, laboratory equipments or library resources etc., it is more difficult for students to be trained as intelligence under unfavorable conditions.
Furthermore, investing in university education establish the status of the country among the world by increasing the reputation and academic strength, attracting more students overseas. With students coming from different places with different specialities, university education would be promoted in return with a more diverse background.
In essence, providing more funding for university education gives an edge over young children education considering its vital role in social development, talents cultivation and international status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Armin Azad | 81 | view |
- Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.— Wait until the class or meet 76
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.First, atmospheric 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, in addition, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82274247492 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12673794806 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0035459655 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.083333333 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299379961296 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109514158369 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652582487884 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170814974552 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833702153326 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 10.9000537634 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.