UNIVERSITY WHICH TEACHES DIFFERENT FIELDS OR UNIVERSITY WHICH TEACHES ONE SPECIFIC FIELD?
UNIVERSITY WHICH TEACHES DIFFERENT FIELDS OR UNIVERSITY WHICH TEACHES ONE SPECIFIC FIELD?
Maybe life was easier in the past. All you needed to get a job was just being familiar with one specific field and that was good enough. But it is not like that now. Even for being a simple clerk in an office you must know so many things and for getting a professional job it will be even harder. That’s why I think nowadays we need education in different fields more than anything else. Here I present two of my reasons.
Firstly, the world is changing too fast. Just a decade ago if you had elementary knowledge about computer and you knew how to use some Microsoft office tools like word or excel you were good enough to get a job. But it is not like that anymore. Everything is changing too fast and it is the same about the requirements for getting a job too. These days companies are looking for some people how know at least a little bit about different things and being good in just one specific major is not the thing which big companies are looking for. Last month I went to a job interview and they asked me about the languages I know fully, I asked “isn’t English enough?” , “Oh, no. we are an international company so we need some people who know at least English and French. Beside that you must be familiar with accounting, management and some other related fields” They said. Just because I was not good enough in some of needed requirements which were not even close to my academic major, I could not get the job. And that’s why I believe you must know different fields.
Secondly, technology has changed the world. Our life is deeply affected by technology and as you know, technology is not just about one specific topic. So many different topics are included in it and if you want to move with technology you must know about different fields. just imagine what a woman needed to be a mother fifteen years ago?, in my view if she just knew how to take care of her children and do household tasks she was enough. But is it the same now? The answer is obvious, NO. nowadays a mother needs to know to work with so many smart tools for doing something really simple like cocking foods, or she must know how to work with computer or social medias to contact to her children whom may be abroad for studying. She also need to have at least some basic information about psychology to grow her children better. And all these thing can be achieved if we do not focus in one specific field and know about other topics as well.
To cut the long story short, all I want to say is that no matter how much you are good in one specific field. If you do not know about some other fileds you cannot do really well in your job. Why so, different fields are too close to each other these days and you must know about them to do a good job. So I believe education which teaches students about many different topics is better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-04 | nastaran1992 | 70 | view |
- how people accept facts 73
- playing outside with friends and using simple toys would be better for children s development 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours. 73
- workers are more satisfied when they do different types of tasks than when they do a single task 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use ''.
...ments for getting a job too. These days companies are looking for some people how know at...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ing for some people how know at least a little bit about different things and being good i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d 'isn't English enough?' , 'Oh, no. we are an international c...
^^
Line 8, column 156, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s not just about one specific topic. So many different topics are included in it and if you wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Just
...y you must know about different fields. just imagine what a woman needed to be a mot...
^^^^
Line 8, column 366, Rule ID: KNEW_NEW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'new'?
Suggestion: new
...teen years ago?, in my view if she just knew how to take care of her children and do...
^^^^
Line 8, column 841, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'these things'?
Suggestion: this thing; these things
...gy to grow her children better. And all these thing can be achieved if we do not focus in o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uch you are good in one specific field. If you do not know about some other fileds...
^^
Line 12, column 357, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... education which teaches students about many different topics is better.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, well, as to, at least, i think, you know, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2426.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 543.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46777163904 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40942935264 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418047882136 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5702070251 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8666666667 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221149233148 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731369844952 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1810927137 0.0737576698707 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284819800854 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.360186035714 0.0645574589148 558% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.