We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (someone you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are important.
Work is a most important part of our daily life. We spend most of the time working, of about almost five days a week in office, rather than the time we spend with our family. Thus the environment where we work should be very friendly and good enough to grow and get success. In my view, the most important characteristics of a good co-worker are helpfulness, mutual understanding, and the competitive nature to a limited extent.
First of all, the co-worker should be helpful while working in a team. When any work is done with the contribution of every worker, it is better than only the one worker taking all the efforts. If we have a helpful co-worker then all the work is equally distributed and it gets done easily. On the other hand, if only one worker works consistently, then the other one will get the credit free of cost. For instance, in my company our boss distribute the work to each team member, and because we are helpful to each other our task gets completed in time and easily. Also, we got the best team award this year. Thus, it is important to have a helpful co-worker.
Further, mutual understanding among employees is like the light in the dark street. Mutual understanding will help all the team members to go in the same direction and agree with each other opinions. Otherwise, there will be high chances of conflict and the team will be destroyed. The co-worker should be able to listen to others and have the potential to learn something when he doesn't know about it. For instance, one of my colleague is very stubborn to his opinion and always thinks that his opinion is perfect, even though in the subject where he lacks knowledge. This lead to conflict among the team members and our friendship gets ruined. Therefore, mutual understanding is very essential while working in a team.
Lastly, the competitive nature of the co-worker is necessary but to a certain extent. While walking on the path of success it is essential to have a competitor with you otherwise, you feel overconfident. But the competition should be limited to the work and the co-worker should accept this in a good aspect. For instance, if you work alone, you get the feeling of being your own boss because you don't have a competitor with you. However, if you compete with the co-worker then you both work hard to achieve success. But this should not show in your personal life. Hence, the competition among you and your co-worker is good to achieve success.
Thus, there are many characteristics of a good co-worker. But the most three important among them are the helpfulness, mutual understanding, and the competitive nature to a limited extent.
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 70
- "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of tra 67
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.All too often, companies hire outsi 50
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sl 69
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...than the time we spend with our family. Thus the environment where we work should be...
^^^^
Line 9, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he potential to learn something when he doesnt know about it. For instance, one of my ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ling of being your own boss because you dont have a competitor with you. However, if...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76241900648 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73099881354 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408207343413 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8043673772 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1481481481 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07407407407 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321715428175 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100170996977 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062013510946 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184993997897 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591572420433 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.