As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology plays a vital role in today's world. While some people believe that as people rely on technology their ability to think for themselves will deteriorate. However, I completely disagree with this topic because technology is not going to deteriorate our thinking abilities rather it helps us to think better.
Firstly, the advancement in the field of technology saves our lot of time. For instance, automobiles, which save our lot of commuting time, we can use that time in doing productive things. We can use that time to think for ourselves and develop some new skills within us. Moreover, the working womens today, who have to complete their daily chores and the office work too, they get some free time for themselves if they commute with automobiles. However, during ancient times, there were no automobiles available so people have to commute anywhere only by means of the walk, as a result they don't get any free time for doing other things. Therefore, technology is very essential in today's hectic world.
Additionally, the countries are becoming digital day by day. For example, the computer is the most important thing in today's world. Computers help in developing variety of programs with help of programming languages. We can write programs of any length and can make new applications, websites of our interest. As a result, this application and websites make our task easy. In earlier days, there were no computers available, so the people cant program and make innovative things to easy their day to day life. Moreover, we can keep each and every document safe and for the time period required, we can delete them, if we won't need it further, earlier there was a tedious lot of paperwork. Therefore, technology makes our life easy and convenient.
Finally, with the help of technology it is easy to communicate to our relatives, family and friends. For instance, mobile, with the help of mobile we can communicate with the world from anywhere anytime. Besides, we can share our photos, audios, and videos with the world by means of applications and websites, such as Facebook and Instagram. This resources can be only accessible with the help of technology. However, when these technologies were not existent, that time the people can get to know about each other only when they meet. Besides, we can learn anything with the help of technology such as Google, whatever we want to know is at our fingertips nowadays.
In conclusion, technology will not be going to deteriorate our thinking rather it increases our ability to think for ourselves. As we use this technologies we get free time for ourselves, so that we can utilize that time in doing other works and to think for ourselves. We can learn more things if we get more time. Also, technology has made human life easier than earlier times.
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 66
- "Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, for the past several decades, food-processing companies have also been adding salicylates to f 66
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of tra 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... by means of the walk, as a result they dont get any free time for doing other thing...
^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e no computers available, so the people cant program and make innovative things to e...
^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...bsites, such as Facebook and Instagram. This resources can be only accessible with t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ility to think for ourselves. As we use this technologies we get free time for ourse...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94947368421 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71497662254 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465263157895 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4428060445 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0740740741 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5925925926 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158785391146 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538379349875 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562982335301 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118815563323 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769420010469 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.