This week, we’ve discussed how carbon dioxide released by gasoline-powered (petrol-powered) cars pollutes the air and contributes to climate change. Let’s focus now on two proposals that governments can consider as they try to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from cars. One proposal is to improve and expand public transportation. The other is to provide financial support to companies that make electric cars and to consumers who buy them. Which proposal do you think is better? Why?
For reducing carbon dioxides governments can make initiative to develop public transportation or to provide financial support to companies making electric cars and commuters also. I think electric cars and also electric public transportation both would be amenable for the environment. Improving and expanding public transportation would not be very affable for environment. In the next paragraphs, my opinions is described.
To begin with, Carbon dioxides emission from cars is playing a antagonistic role in the environment. There are umpteen types of resources. Transportation , more specifically cars emit a good number of gases such as carbon dioxides. Electric car would be a solution to justify the transportation system. As these types of cars do not emit hazardous gases , government can make an approval for manufacturing electric cars. The government can provide financial support to the companies for making myriad number of electric cars. Because for manufacturing electric cars needs a good number of investments for getting advanced technology and machineries set up and space.
Using advanced technology, the cost of cars would be high. So, government should provide financial supporting system for consumers. Although cars manufacturing company get financial support , without getting profit companies do not love to develop electric cars. Consumers need financial support and back up to get electric cars. Government can make electrical public transportation system. It will be helpful for commuters. It would be affordable and accessible. If government take initiative to perpetuate the environmental pollution , in future we can get an amenable environment.
On the other hand, another proposal was public transportation. Public transportation such as buses , trains and ships are another culprit for ambience. These transports emit vulnerable gases which are amicable for milieu. Using public transportation , commuters would not use private transports. For that reason, the rate of environmental pollution would be attenuated but would not be removed totally.
In conclusion, there is no way to alloying environment pollution except using electrical cars. Government should develop electrical transportation system. Developing public transportation would not be very amicable for milieu.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 61 | view |
- TOEFL Task 2 Professor Today we re going to talk about the debate between economic growth and protecting the environment Economic growth creates new jobs and gives people money they can use to improve their lives On the other hand if we protect the enviro 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 33
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 50
- TOEFL Task 2 Professor Today we re going to talk about the debate between economic growth and protecting the environment Economic growth creates new jobs and gives people money they can use to improve their lives On the other hand if we protect the enviro 70
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...nies making electric cars and commuters also. I think electric cars and also electri...
^^^^
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t paragraphs, my opinions is described. To begin with, Carbon dioxides emission ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dioxides'' or 'dioxide's'?
Suggestion: dioxides'; dioxide's
...described. To begin with, Carbon dioxides emission from cars is playing a antagon...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... dioxides emission from cars is playing a antagonistic role in the environment. T...
^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pteen types of resources. Transportation , more specifically cars emit a good numb...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ypes of cars do not emit hazardous gases , government can make an approval for man...
^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cial support to the companies for making myriad number of electric cars. Because ...
^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ufacturing company get financial support , without getting profit companies do not...
^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o perpetuate the environmental pollution , in future we can get an amenable enviro...
^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion. Public transportation such as buses , trains and ships are another culprit fo...
^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... for milieu. Using public transportation , commuters would not use private transpo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 43.0788530466 19% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89880952381 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33392833512 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467261904762 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3858845015 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4074074074 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.4444444444 20.6045352989 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100907952509 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351148612917 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454699850136 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659713116932 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382325656345 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 58.1214874552 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.05 10.9000537634 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.