In what way can high school teachers better improve students’ study interests? a. applying more technology in class. b. explaining the close connection between what they are learning and the world c. arranging students to work in group assignments instead of working independently Choose one of them and explain the reasons. Use specific details and examples to support your
Teamwork is a critical skill nowadays as it infiltrates different aspects of our lives. For example, people communicate and corporate with others for preparing presentations or doing assignments. Without the stress of asking and answering, people can be more relaxed and natural. Thus, I prefer the best way for high school teachers to improve students’ study interests is to arrange for students to work on group assignments instead of working independently. The followings are my reasons for choosing this statement.
Firstly, working in a group can improve students’ engagement. High school students, mostly from fifteen to eighteen years old, are mostly busy with their studies. They often have abundant homework because high school students are working hard for entering universities. As the tough homework has used up their time, students are less active during class because they may feel bored of learning. If students have the chance to communicate with each other, they may be engaged and focus more on classwork. In addition, if schools apply more technology in class, students may be distracted by the complicated new tools. Thus, group work can improve students’ study interests. Take the example of my cousin, his high school used to ask them to work independently. (想不出来)
Secondly, working in a group can improve students’ efficiency. Students can arrange different things for each person to work on. As every student is engaged in the work, they may work hard for their part because they do not need to finish the entire task. Instead, students can choose the part they are familiar with. Thus, the assignments can be finished efficiently. Take the example of my nephew, his work was usually done in the group when he was in high school. He usually chose the part he did well in, for example, mathematics. He helped the group to analyze data and graphs while his teammates finished other sectors. Their work usually got good grades because each part of the work was done successfully. Just like in the case of my nephew, there are countless events examples to my nephew’s because different students have their own skilled parts. Thus, working on group assignments can improve students’ efficiency.
In conclusion, I prefer the best way for high school teachers to improve students’ study interests is to arrange students to work on group assignments because it can improve their efficiency and engagement. Practicing communication skills, high school students can accumulate experience when they are facing with their further studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
...tive during class because they may feel bored of learning. If students have the chance t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28467153285 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82979771441 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464720194647 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2186089486 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5384615385 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8076923077 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03846153846 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389318598983 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1371999321 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117177723846 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289668842347 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608700393567 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.